WyBlog, the best thing about New Jersey since the invention of the 24 hour diner.
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." - Ronald Reagan
CH 2.0 Info Center
The Jersey Report
Labor Union Report
Net Right Nation
The Patriot Post Newsletter
Victor Davis Hanson
J! E! T! S! Jets! Jets! Jets!
NJ.com Caldwell Forum
The Caldwells Patch
The Jersey Tomato Press
"This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, social issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes."
#VRWC Twitter feed:
Remember Patricia Jannuzzi? She dared to post Catholic teachings on Facebook, and the homofascists went berserk. Initially it was reported that she'd been fired from her teaching job at Immaculata Catholic High School. But happily, that turns out to be incorrect.
Patricia Jannuzzi, the veteran Immaculata High School teacher suspended for her anti-gay Facebook posts, will be reinstated immediately, school principal Jean Kline said in a letter dated Friday.
Jannuzzi, a 33-year theology teacher at Immaculata, was forced by Immaculata to deactivate her Facebook page after several alumni started circulating screen shots of her sharply worded posts against gay marriage and gay rights. Two days later, the school placed her on administrative leave.
Don't you just love how the supposedly impartial media frames her statements? "Anti-gay." "Sharply worded posts against gay marriage and gay rights." As if she were evil. Or worse.
Let's put it into the proper perspective. Her postings were Pro-Catholic. It's no secret that Holy Mother Church opposes same-sex "marriage." It shouldn't be controversial for a teacher in a Catholic school to articulate that opposition. Especially a religion teacher.
If Immaculata isn't teaching Catholic doctrine in their religion classes, what exactly are they teaching?
One is left to wonder. Because the school continues to dance around the tenets of our faith.
Immaculata High School has reached an understanding with Mrs. Patricia Jannuzzi. It is the School's position that a Catholic school teacher must always communicate the faith in a way that is positive and never hurtful. Tone and choice of words matter and I trust Mrs. Jannuzzi's stated promise to strive always to teach in a spirit of truth and charity.
From the beginning this was a personnel and not a theological issue. We are now and always have been united in our understanding and commitment to the teachings of the Catholic Church. By agreement with all parties involved, there will be no further comment on the issue.
Right. It's not "theological." And you can't talk about it.
The letter goes on to say that teachers have been told that if the issue comes up in the classroom, students will be told "this was a personnel issue and not one about theology" and there should be no further discussion about it. Kline encouraged parents to tell students the same thing if the issue comes up at home.
"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the War Room!"
Since when are parents prohibited from talking about Catholic theology? By a Catholic school no less? That's disgraceful. And wrong.
What we need is more emphasis on morality. Instead we get vaccillation. And appeasement.
So let me introduce some clarity.
The Catholic Church thus teaches: "Basing itself on sacred Scripture, which
presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always
declared that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered. They are contrary
to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not
proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no
circumstances can they be approved."
(Catechism of the Catholic Church 2357).
Catholics who participate in homosexual acts, or who advocate for same-sex "marriage," are wise to heed the stipulations of Canon 915:
Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.
Make note of these words Principal Kline — "obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin" — and be guided accordingly.
That goes for anyone who persists in promoting the homofascist agenda, too.
There is but one path for those with homosexual tendencies: chastity.
"Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that
teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship,
by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely
approach Christian perfection."
(CCC 2357. 2359).
Immaculata High School, and all Catholics, should have no problem making these
doctrinal points abundantly clear. Perhaps they could ask Mrs. Jannuzzi to
show them the way.
It is a tenet of the Catholic faith that homosexuality is instrinsically disordered.
It is also a tenet of the Catholic faith that same-sex "marriage" is a mirage.
Alas, at Immaculata High School in Somerville, New Jersey, you can be Catholic and believe these truths, but you can't post them on Facebook. Or mention them in a classroom.
Patricia Jannuzzi, the Immaculata High School teacher who was forced to remove her Facebook page by the school after making anti-gay posts, has been put on administrative leave.
"This episode has reflected not only on this teacher but, by extension, on Immaculata High School," the letter states. "We regret deeply any hurt this has caused to any individuals and the negative light in which it has cast our school."
Jannuzzi, a theology teacher with Immaculata for 33 years, was forced to de-activate her Facebook page after an online petition -- which now has more than 900 signatures -- called attention to her posts.
Patricia Jannuzzi was sacked for affirming Catholic doctrine. Her catholic (yes, small c) employer caved to the homofascists. Note their characterization of her statements — "anti-gay" — instead of what they really are, Catholic teaching.
Why? Because noted theologian Susan Sarandon objected! Oh, and some homosexual bozo who had a bit part in a Real Housewives episode got his knickers in a twist too. The part where his tweet libels Rick Santorum? Yeah, that's tolerance! dontcha know.
Because only Catholics are haters. Homosexuals are the epitome of reason and understanding. Their precious feelings must be assuaged, always.
Or they'll call you names.
While I am not Catholic, I am sufficiently acquainted with their doctrines on marriage and the family to conclude that Ms. Januzzi said nothing in her rant with which the Pope would disagree. And having spent the past several months researching radical feminism, I can say with absolute certainty that the "agenda" is exactly what Ms. Januzzi says it is. But the 21st-Century Thought Police can't let the truth be spoken.
Let me quote more of Ms. Januzzi's post. She was reacting emotionally to a story ("Crass: Gay Activist Tweets THIS To Ben Carson Following CNN Interview") that she linked on her Facebook page, and her point was not very clearly made. She said gay activists, after using the "born that way" argument to gain status under the 14th Amendment "equal protection" clause, will then "argue everyone should be able to choose" homosexuality. Anyone familiar with feminist theory knows that radical lesbians have never accepted the "born that way" argument, instead advocating lesbianism as a "challenge to male supremacy and its basic institution of heterosexuality," to quote Professor Sheila Jeffreys. This feminist perspective was celebrated in a 1973 song by Alix Dobkin, "Every Woman Can Be a Lesbian."
The radical "choice" view of sexuality advocated by lesbian feminists is seldom heard from gay males, who usually describe their homosexual desires as an uncontrollable urge. However, one finds across the spectrum of the LGBT rainbow a unanimous consensus on what we might call the Compulsory Approval Doctrine:
No one can ever be permitted to express a personal aversion or moral objection to homosexual behavior.
Disapproval is synonymous with "hate," according to gay activists, and the cultural consequence of the Compulsory Approval Doctrine is to stigmatize heterosexuality as an expression of prejudice. Many gay people have convinced themselves that the "straight" person's rejection of homosexual behavior is implicit proof of homophobia — an irrational fear — so that all heterosexuals are basically viewed as ignorant bigots afflicted with neurotic sexual repression. And if you dare cite religious injunctions against homosexuality, you thereby prove that you are certainly a hater. Quod erat demonstrandum.
Because, apparently, disapproval of homosexual urges is tantamount to imposing a Death Sentence. I'm told that kids who believe they are gay are prone to commit suicide if they aren't immediately celebrated with parades, balloons, confetti, and abject deference to the Inherent Moral Authority of their newfound sexual deviancy. Their feelings trump everything. Including reason.
Look: I'm old enough to remember when a boy could be suspended from public school if his hair was long enough to touch his shirt collar in back. I remember when a girl could get kicked off the cheerleading squad if she engaged in PDA (public display of affection) by holding hands with her boyfriend. There was a time — and not really that long ago, either — when young people could not demand approval from their elders, and in fact teenagers were constantly subjected to lectures of adult disapproval for their adolescent wildness. Yet we did not commit suicide, nor did we organize petitions to get our teachers fired because they disapproved of us, inter alia, smoking dope and listening to Led Zeppelin.
Our parents and teachers told us we were hellbound heathens and, once we grew up and looked back on our misspent youth, most of us agreed they were right. God forbid any of my kids should ever go wild like I went wild in the '70s. America was still a free country back then, and adults weren't expected to tiptoe around lest they bruise the fragile self-esteem of a Special Snowflake. Back then, totalitarianism was a threat posed by the Soviet Union. Now the totalitarians are here among us, organizing to suppress dissent, punishing expression of opinions contrary to those of the progressive elite.
The totalitarian Gay Mafia has punished Patricia Jannuzzi.
But, I suspect they aren't done with her yet.
It's not sufficient for her to lose her current job. She has to become unemployable. Her livelihood must be defenestrated. It's the Godfather paradigm: make an example of one, and the rest will fall in line.
I ask you. What teacher at Immaculata will dare defend Catholic doctrine tomorrow?
The comments at the original news article sadden me. The hatred and vitriol directed at Patricia Jannuzzi, and at Catholics in general, is staggering.
But it's par for the course in Homosexualville, where the least tolerant and most judgmental people you'll ever meet conspire to stamp out any vestiges of disagreement with their chosen lifestyle. They constantly seek affirmation of their debauchery, even as their consciences nag them from behind the brick wall they've erected to compartmentalize their sins. Because even the tiniest spark of righteousness shakes the very foundation of their licentiousness. Such is the fragility of their zeitgeist, censure is anathema.
Shame on Immaculata High School for abandoning Catholic doctrine, and for throwing one of their own into the lion's den.
There are Christians in Iraq and Africa who refuse to renounce their faith even as they face certain death. Yet the administration at Immaculata cowers in fear at the mere thought of "anti-gay" publicity, as if their eternal souls would be tarnished by the approbrium of fornicating sodomites.
Shame on them, I say again. Now is not the time to go weak.
Homosexuality is wrong. It is contrary to nature, and to nature's God.
Pray for the presecutors of Patricia Jannuzzi. Pray that their hearts may be
opened, and that their sins might be forgiven. Pray for strength to
resist the hordes of secularization. Pray that Almighty God has mercy on us all.
Imagine a world where 57,762,169 unborn children weren't sacrificed on the altar of feminism. Imagine a world where the charnal houses of Planned Parenthood stood as silent as the ovens of Auschwitz, grim reminders of depravity, defanged. Imagine a world where the life of an unborn child is as precious as the life of a pig or a bird.
Imagine a world where our representatives had the guts to protect the unborn.
House Republican leadership tonight abruptly dropped a bill that would ban elective abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy.
According to news reports, female GOP lawmakers raised concerns on the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, prompting party leaders to realize they did not have the votes to pass the bill.
Prominent Republican members who rallied against the plan to limit late-term abortions include Reps. Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, Renee Ellmers of North Carolina and Jackie Walorski of Indiana.
I'll defer comments on their cowardice to my wife, who posted this on Facebook earlier today:
I am so saddened by this news. 18,000 preemies are murdered each year, 18,000. How can such a wonderful nation support these murderers. We act so compassionate for mental health, those bullied, beheading across the world, shootings of innocents, mia, kia, and wounded warriors. But those who passed this 'right' to allow such atrocities be damned. My heart is broken for those 18,000 preemies housed in a warm womb for 6 months, only to be brutally killed and disposed of like garbage. What are those who opposed this bill and those 18,000 mothers each year thinking. Moreso, what are those doctors, nurses, and caregivers, and insurance companies think they are doing for society at large. I am just so sad.
What can I add to that? Somewhere, Satan is smiling. And Jesus is weeping.
Pray with Pope Francis, pray that the hearts of our leaders will be opened.
60 percent of Americans support enacting a 20 week abortion ban. It's inconceivable that anyone could be so callous as to not feel the suffering of these innocent babies.
And yet, abortion is the holy sacrament of feminism. A woman isn't really liberated until she's had one, or so I'm told.
I'll leave you with the wisdom of President Reagan: "I've noticed that
everyone who is for abortion has already been born."
Remember when Jesus said "turn the other cheek?"
Pope Francis must've been absent from CCD that day.
Pope Francis said Thursday there are limits to freedom of expression, especially when it insults or ridicules someone's faith.
Francis spoke about the Paris terror attacks while en route to the Philippines, defending free speech as not only a fundamental human right but a duty to speak one's mind for the sake of the common good.
But he said there were limits.
By way of example, he referred to Alberto Gasparri, who organizes papal trips and was standing by his side aboard the papal plane.
"If my good friend Dr. Gasparri says a curse word against my mother, he can expect a punch," Francis said, throwing a pretend punch his way. "It's normal. You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others."
Violence as a first resort is "normal?" You insult my mother and I can punch you in the nose? You satirize my religion and I can kill you and 16 of your friends?
Did the Pope really just say that?
I would very much like to believe that His Holiness was misquoted.
Because the way I learned the catechism, the proper response to someone who insults your mother is to pray for their soul to be healed.
Sticks and stones, and all that.
By the same token, violence is the proper response, indeed the just response, to protracted, willful, systematic violence. Like, say, to the massacre of Christians by ISIS and Boko Haram. Or to the jihad waged by Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran.
So I await Pope Francis' reconstitution of the Knights Templar. And if we're
gonna start bustin' heads, we sure could use a man like
Charles Martel again.
The city of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, said a for-profit wedding chapel owned by two ministers doesn't have to perform same-sex marriages.
The city has been embroiled in controversy ever since the owners of the Hitching Post sued the city. They say a city anti-discrimination law threatened to force them to marry same-sex couples now that gay marriage is legal in Idaho.
The story lit up conservative and gay-rights blogs. Wedding chapel owners Donald and Evelyn Knapp said they feared jail time or fines if they declined marriage services to a same-sex couple.
Initially, the city said its anti-discrimination law did apply to the Hitching Post, since it is a commercial business. Earlier this week, Coeur d'Alene city attorney Mike Gridley sent a letter to the Knapps' attorneys at the Alliance Defending Freedom saying the Hitching Post would have to become a not-for-profit to be exempt.
But Gridley said after further review, he determined the ordinance doesn't specify non-profit or for-profit.
"After we've looked at this some more, we have come to the conclusion they would be exempt from our ordinance because they are a religious corporation," Gridley explained.
Naturally, the LGBT folks reacted with tolerance and understanding. After all, everybody deserves to live freely as they see fit, right?
Just kidding, they went into full-tilt homofascist apoplexy. The vitriol spewed by the denizens of "equality" is breathtaking to behold.
Here's some choice remarks from the gang at a site called LGBTQ Nation.
"The Christian Taliban need to stop breathing through their mouths, their breath stinks."
"Not gonna lie, I'm very surprised at this. And while I still think it's BS that a government-realized, for-profit business is given a religious exemption, I'm just going to sit on ACLU's coattails and see where this goes. Hitching Post has put itself on the line. They are now a RELIGIOUS organization in public light. So the moment that they screw up and perform a non-religious business transaction, the ACLU and the Coeur d'Alene Attorney General will be on them in an instant."
"Come on down to The Bigot Post!"
Classy. But no better than the associates of a fellow who pretentiously calls himself Joe. My. God.
"As always, anyone who uses the words 'deeply held religious beliefs' needs to be punches in their fucking face."
"Fine. Assholes are assholes. Let's just move on, and be glad that ADF does not get its test case. May their Religious Business die a quick death due to lack of Religious clientele."
"So I guess the next time I go into a commercial business and discover it decorated in crosses with a prayer bench and its menu of services and/or products printed inside a Bible, I should realize I've entered the Twilight Zone, oh, my bad, I mean a 'religious corporation' that probably doesn't want my gay dollars, right? I dunno, folks, but at some point I think there's going to be a test IRS case or a lawsuit or both. You can legally stretch your deeply held effort to discriminate as a 'for profit' business only so much, if at all."
"Look at what is happening in Houston. The attorneys are drawing back the subpoenas, but teabagistan is still claiming persecution and will soon be having a huge hate rally there."
"If they want to play martyr, they should have kept it a business and suffered the slings and arrows of their homosexual overlords. Sounds like the Unruhs took the easiest possible way out. (I'm guessing they are tax-exempt now, too. Yippee!!)"
"Homosexual overlords" pretty much sums up what this is all about. Them, inposing their depravity on us. And making sure we can't earn a living without genuflecting to their tyranny.
The homofascists will be back. They're not going to stop until Cardinal Dolan is forced at gunpoint to don rainbow plumage for Adam and Steve's Big Gay Saint Patrick's Cathedral "wedding."
Watch out for their next move, a better "test case."
I spoke to Leo, the exec director of the Idaho ACLU. He is no happier than anyone else. They are constrained by the law, and I found them to be sincere and mournful over this.
We are going to work on bringing this to the courts, Idaho has several new laws working through the system that would bring this 'Hitching Post' issue back into focus.
When I spoke to them I was also very upset, but they were gracious and empathetic and they are not willing to accept this ...they just need the right legal framework, one where it is not just a fight against this couples' First Amendment rights.
Clearly the First Amendment means nothing to the homofascists. The "free exercise" of religion is anathema to their licentiousness, because it holds up a standard to which they cannot adhere. And so religious beliefs must be ridiculed, and ultimately eradicated, lest some hypothetical gay couple feel uncomfortable walking past a church.
The Hitching Post is hardly the only wedding venue in Coeur d'Alene, let alone the state of Idaho, or these United States of America. Homosexuals could ignore it, and go about their business freely and unobtrusively. Just imagine, the Knapps live in peace, and homosexuals exercise their misguided, but alas Constitutional right to "marry" surrounded by like-minded people who want their business. Everybody wins!
That's what I call "tolerance."
And, for one last thought, I'll say again what I always say when the
homofascists start screaming about "discrimination." Pull your
cater-to-me-or-else crap with a Muslim cleric or Islamic business. Let us
know how that works out for you. That is, if you manage to leave with
your head still attached.
Feminism's holy sacrament of abortion will not be denied.
The California Department of Managed Health Care hath decreed that all employers, including churches, must pay for elective abortions in their health insurance plans.
A coalition of pro-life groups is challenging the mandate.
A campaign against the state of California mandating abortion coverage in insurance plans is intensifying. Several complaints have been filed with the federal government to keep it from violating what Christian legal groups consider American's fundamental rights and go against their religiously held beliefs and conscience.
The Department of Managed Health Care has ordered all employers, including churches and other religious organizations such as colleges and universities, to pay for elective abortions in their plans.
Alliance Defending Freedom and Life Legal Defense Foundation are representing seven California churches who object to the coverage, alleging the mandate violates federal law. One of the churches being represented is Dr. Jim Garlow's Skyline Church in San Diego, which does not want be forced into funding the practice of abortion through its health care coverage.
Casey Mattox, an attorney with the Christian legal group, Alliance Defending Freedom, argues that the Golden State has gone too far by trouncing the liberties that they hold dear.
"Forcing a church to be party to elective abortion is one of the most unimaginable assaults on our most fundamental American freedoms," Mattox asserts.
Mattox argues that there is no way California should be allowed to bypass federal law and end up getting away with forcing churches to fund a practice that the Bible specifically teaches against.
Christianity is under attack by a tyranny more insidious than anything George III could have dreamed of. Homofascists now demand church-sanctioned "weddings." HHS mandates coverage for contraceptives, abortifascients, and sterlizations. And here the State of California goes one better, requiring their 30 pieces of silver for infanticide.
Appealing to Obama's HHS is pointless. They're obviously delighted with California's regulations, and their only question is how to extend mandatory elective abortion coverage to all 57 states.
Religious liberty's only hope lies with the U.S. Supreme Court.
Alas, given SCOTUS' recent abominable 6-3 decision against Texas abortion law in Whole Woman's Health v Lakey, it appears that both Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy have gone over to the Dark Side. They're apparently reluctant to place any "undo burden" on a woman's "right" to murder her unborn child.
I can easily see them agreeing that paying for her own abortion is indeed an "undo burden."
America has lost her moral compass. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us.
First, the California abortion mandate is a law of general applicability. This means no violation of the First Amendment: Under U.S. Supreme Court precedent, religious freedom doesn't matter.
But Hobby Lobby! Nope. HL is a limited cased based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The RFRA only applies to federal law, not state.
Since California could care less about religious freedom, we don't have an RFRA-type law.
But Obamacare forbids states from discriminating against policies that don't provide abortion coverage. True. Alliance Defending Freedom and Life Legal Defense Foundation are on the case.
Go get them, guys, but as the story says, good luck with that.
The Obama Administration is pro-abortion. More, it has amply demonstrated it won't enforce laws or regulations with which it disagrees. Thus, I would be very surprised if Obamacarians brought its fellow ideological travelers in California to heel.
So sue! Sure. But I have two words for you: "Ninth Circuit."
Bottom line: California has crossed the post-Christian bridge into the anti-Christian era.
The Obama Administration has too.
So have most courts, particularly the Ninth Circuit.
I don't expect these churches to find legal relief short of the Supreme Court. And that will take years.
So I say, "disobey." Refuse to offer abortion coverage.
Dare California to put ministers and priests in jail.
We are all martyrs for Christ. Let us be martyrs for the unborn too.
Two Christian ministers who own an Idaho wedding chapel were told they had to either perform same-sex weddings or face jail time and up to $1,000 in fines, according to a lawsuit filed Friday in federal court.
Alliance Defending Freedom is representing Donald and Evelyn Knapp, two ordained ministers who own the Hitching Post Wedding Chapel in Coeur d'Alene.
"Right now they are at risk of being prosecuted," attorney Jeremy Tedesco told me. "The threat of enforcement is more than just credible."
The wedding chapel is registered as a "religious corporation" limited to performing "one-man-one-woman marriages as defined by the Holy Bible."
However, the chapel is also a for-profit business and city officials said that means the owners must comply with the local nondiscrimination ordinance.
That ordinance, passed in 2013, prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and it applies to housing, employment and public accommodation.
City Attorney Warren Wilson told The Spokesman-Review in May that the Hitching Post Wedding Chapel likely would be required to follow the ordinance.
"I would think that the Hitching Post would probably be considered a place of public accommodation that would be subject to the ordinance," he said.
He also told television station KXLY that any wedding chapel that turns away a gay couple would in theory be a violation of the law "and you're looking at a potential misdemeanor citation."
Wilson confirmed to Knapp in a telephone conversation that even ordained ministers would be required to perform same-sex weddings, the lawsuit alleges.
"Wilson also responded that Mr. Knapp was not exempt from the ordinance because the Hitching Post was a business and not a church," the lawsuit states.
And if he refused to perform the ceremonies, Wilson reportedly told the minister that he could be fined up to $1,000 and serve up to 180 days in jail.
Remember when Liberty meant something?
Liberals love to harp on the "separation of church and state" when it suits their (often nefarious) purposes. No religion in the public square! Unless it's a Christian minister ordered at gunpoint to perform a same-sex "wedding." Then, party on dudes!
The state will compel you to sin. The state will compel you to celebrate sin.
And they'll subpoena your sermons if they think you're complaining about that.
This is not America. We were a nation founded by people seeking religious freedom, people who fled government oppression of their beliefs and rites. They came to these shores to be left alone, to be free from persecution.
Now the government they created to guarantee their freedom has become the
oppressor, cloaking its thuggery in the guise of "equality." The homofascists
use that word, but it does not mean what they think it means. This new tyranny
is the antithesis of the Founders vision. And its goal is to ensure that every
last vestige of religious liberty is eradicated, because homosexuals believe
they are "more equal" than anyone else.
Finding a cure for ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease) is an admirable goal. And many well-intentioned American Catholics have taken the Ice Bucket Challenge to raise awareness of ALS.
But the cure cannot come at the expense of other innocent life.
The ALS Association, recipient of donations associated with the Ice Bucket Challenge, uses embryonic stem cells in their research. And now, Newark Archbishop John J. Myers is speaking up to warn us of the moral conflict associated with sacrificing one life to save another.
The Newark Archdiocese has told North Jersey pastors and Catholic school officials that holding Ice Bucket Challenges, a wildly popular fad that has raised millions of dollars to combat a crippling illness, conflicts with church teachings by funding embryonic stem-cell research.
The warning was issued Thursday in a letter from a church official and with the blessing of Archbishop John J. Myers. It said some of the research funded by the ALS Association, which receives much of the money from the Ice Bucket Challenge, involves embryonic stem-cell research, which is opposed by the Catholic Church because of conflicts with its antiabortion mission.
The challenge involves dumping ice water on participants' heads and donating money for research into ALS, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease. The Rev. Lawrence Fama, director of the archdiocesan Office of Respect Life, called the challenge "a stunt" that can be "fun and engaging," but questioned whether the practice conflicts with "Catholic moral teaching."
The archdiocese sent the letter Thursday to principals at all 94 Catholic schools in the archdiocese, and to pastors and religious education staff at 218 parishes. It suggested sending donations to organizations that don't use embryonic stem-cell research.
The knee-jerk reaction, of course, is to condemn Catholics for not wanting to find a cure for ALS. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
The Pope John Paul II Medical Research Institute funds morally acceptible ALS research. And they gladly accept donations associated with the Ice Bucket Challenge.
We are receiving increasing financial support from donors asking whether their donations will go directly to support ALS research. We want to assure people that any donation specifically directed towards finding a cure for ALS will be used to support medical research for that cause.
Catholics can indeed raise awareness of ALS. Archbishop Myers leads by
example. Together, we will find a cure.
New HHS Secretary Sylvia Burwell, late of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's population control efforts, has again "revised" Obamacare's anti-Catholic abortifascient and and birth control mandate. But her new regulations still firmly place the burden of providing life-destroying drugs and procedures on the employer.
Meet the new form, it's functionally equivalent to the old form.
The new arrangement as a more complicated accounting gimmick, no different in effect than its predecessors.
Arina Grossu, Director for the Center for Human Dignity at the Family Research Council, said the amendment "is simply another clerical layer because the employer still remains the legal gateway by which these drugs and services will be provided to their employees. It's very disappointing that the Obama administration is doubling down on its plans to punish charities and non-profits that assist the poor and homeless, who in some cases have nowhere else to turn for assistance."
Although the Obama administration is still seeking comments for its final implementation of the new rule, the nation's religious leaders concur that the latest change still fails to observe all Americans' First Amendment freedom of religion.
"On initial review of the government's summary of the regulations, we note with disappointment that the regulations would not broaden the 'religious employer' exemption to encompass all employers with sincerely held religious objections to the mandate," Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz of Louisville, Kentucky, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), said on Friday. "Instead, the regulations would only modify the 'accommodation,' under which the mandate still applies and still requires provision of the objectionable coverage."
"Also, by proposing to extend the 'accommodation' to the closely held for-profit employers that were wholly exempted by the Supreme Court's recent decision in Hobby Lobby, the proposed regulations would effectively reduce, rather than expand, the scope of religious freedom," he added.
Who gets the "opt-out" form is irrelevant. Forcing a religious organization to ask for the objectionable coverage is the real problem. Morally, Catholics cannot participate in any aspect of provisioning life-destroying drugs and procedures.
Instead of working with the USCCB, the Obama administration went back to the Kermit Gosnell Fan Club at Planned Parenthood for input on their "revised" mandate rules. And of course they baked in onerous penalties for anyone who follows his faith.
"Effective immediately, this latest rule still orders charities like the Little Sisters of the Poor, non-profit Christian colleges like Wheaton College, and religious broadcasters like EWTN to violate their consciences simply because they legally contract for health coverage," Grossu continued. "The government uses their contract as the basis to force their insurers to provide their employees with free contraception and drugs that can kill human embryos, against their sincere conscientious beliefs."
"If these charities and non-profits follow their conscience and decline to participate in the meaningless accounting gimmick, the administration will make them pay huge penalties accruable on a daily basis — one hundred dollars per employee per day," she said.
"Additionally, the government is also soliciting comment on new ways to force family businesses to violate their deeply held moral and religious convictions due to the HHS mandate in an attempt to address and skirt the recent Supreme Court ruling. However, the government's actions here still force family businesses to be complicit in what they view as morally wrong," Grossu added.
Obama and his henchmen are being purposefully obtuse, thumbing their noses at the Supreme Court, and at religious Americans too. They are beholden to a cabal of radical feminists hell-bent on overthrowing all vestiges of traditional morality. They only respect the Progressive hegemony of the State, and all other forms of authority must be eradicated lest they instill doubt in the minds of the citizenry.
So everyone has to conform, or the invalidity of the State's coercion will become all too apparent.
Fortunately, the Supreme Court has already told HHS they can't do this. Alas,
the price of Liberty is eternal vigilance.
The homosexualization of our society is accelerating. The Progressives' 11th Commandment is, Thou Shalt Celebrate Deviancy, Or Else.
So it comes as no surprise that our president has decreed religious organizations with federal contracts cannot actively live the tenets of their faith. And nevermind that SCOTUS already rejected the same sort of anti-Christian discrimination in Obamacare. The homofascists must be obeyed!
President Obama signed an executive order Monday barring federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity — ignoring the pleas of Christian and other faith leaders to include an exemption for religious organizations.
The executive order would prevent Christian and other religious organizations with federal contracts from requiring workers to adhere to the tenets of their religious beliefs. Christianity Today reports the order could impact religious non-profits such as World Vision, World Relief and Catholic Charities.
"If religious organizations cannot require that their employees conduct themselves in ways consistent with the teachings of their faith — then, essentially, those organizations are unable to operate in accordance with their faith," Peter Sprigg, Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Family Research Council, told me.
He said the president's order forces employers to put aside their principles in the name of political correctness. "This level of coercion is nothing less than viewpoint blackmail that bullies into silence every contractor and subcontractor who has moral objections to homosexual behavior," Sprigg said.
"The mask is coming off of the homosexual movement's agenda. They really do not believe in religious liberty. They want forced affirmation of homosexual and transgender conduct to trump every other consideration in the workplace — including religious liberty."
Bullying and shutuppery, part and parcel of the homosexual agenda.
And if they force religious organizations to relinquish their mission of community service, so much the better. Because the only acceptable preaching is that of reliance on The State. Silence those pesky Christers and all that's left are the Socialists.
Listen to Joe Biden wave the rainbow flag:
"I don't care what your culture is," he said in remarks covered by Associated Press. "Inhumanity is inhumanity. Prejudice is prejudice is prejudice."
Unless, of course, it's prejudice against Christians. That's de rigeur.
The Obama administration and its militant cronies want to tell Christians whom to hire, how to run their business and how to think.
And now the president has decreed that any religious group that holds viewpoints divergent from the LGBT agenda is not worthy of federal tax dollars.
Soon we won't be worthy of our tax exemption either. Then perhaps religious broadcasters will see their licenses revoked by Obama's FCC. His pen and his phone will write a new Bible, and it shall be the only Bible authorized by his almighty government.
Their ultimate goal? Cumpulsory homosexuality, with penalties for
non-participation. Because boning you up the ass is how government lets you
know it loves you.
Well whaddaya know, the First Amendment's "Establishment Clause" cuts both ways. For those of you who are unfamiliar with its heretofore deprecated second half, allow me to refresh your memory:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…
Which means that closely held corporations can freely exercise their owners' religion.
The Supreme Court ruled today that the Christian-run Hobby Lobby doesn't have to obey the HHS mandate that is a part of Obamacare that requires businesses to pay for abortion causing drugs in their employee health care plans.
The Obama administration was attempting to make Hobby Lobby and thousands of pro-life businesses and organizations comply with the HHS mandate that compels religious companies to pay for birth control and abortion-causing drugs for their employees. However, the U.S. Supreme Court today issued a favorable ruling in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a landmark case addressing the Constitutionally guaranteed rights of business owners to operate their family companies without violating their deeply held religious convictions.
Writing for the 5-4 majority, Justice Samuel Alito handed down the decision for the high court, saying, "The Supreme Court holds government can't require closely held corporations with religious owners to provide contraception coverage."
HHS's contraception mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion," the decision reads, adding that "the decision concerns only the contraceptive mandate and should not be understood to mean that all insurance mandates." The opinion said the "plain terms of Religious Freedom Restoration Act" are "perfectly clear."
Poor Sandra Fluke. Now she has to pay for her own contraceptives. Someone
ought to take up a collection before she accidentally reproduces.
While all the right-thinking people are giddy over the Presbyterians' embrace of unnatural, same-sex "marriage," a far more sinister policy was also approved at the church's General Assembly.
Sadly, it's something our intelligensia also emphatically endorses — the "divestment" pogrom against Israel.
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) on Friday became the most prominent religious group in the United States to endorse divestment as a protest against Israeli policies toward Palestinians, voting to sell church stock in three companies whose products Israel uses in the occupied territories.
The General Assembly voted by a razor-thin margin -- 310-303 -- to sell stock in Caterpillar, Hewlett-Packard and Motorola Solutions. Two years ago, the General Assembly rejected a similar divestment proposal by two votes.
The American Jewish Committee, a policy and advocacy group based in New York, said the vote was "driven by hatred of Israel." But Heath Rada, moderator for the church meeting, said immediately after the vote that "in no way is this a reflection of our lack of love for our Jewish brothers and sisters."
The decision is expected to reverberate well beyond the church. It comes amid discouragement over failed peace talks that have left activists desperate for some way to affect change and as the broader movement known as BDS -- or boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel -- has gained some momentum in the U.S., Israel's closest and most important ally.
Oh those pesky Jews. If they'd only roll over and die! Then the peaceful Palestinians could live forever in harmony with nature and their equally peaceful Arab brothers.
In a separate vote, the assembly also voted to re-examine its historic support for a two-state solution.
And there you have it. It is now the official policy of a purportedly Christian
sect that Israel should cease to exist. And with it, presumably,
Yad Vashem as well. Because in the
Presbyterian church, the promise of "never again" has expired after a mere
Because nothing says "Jesus Is Risen" quite like heresy.
President Obama tapped the first openly gay Episcopal Bishop to lead the closing Easter Prayer, Monday.
You remember Gene Robinson. He left his wife and children to fornicate with another man. Then the Episcopalians made him a Bishop. Which is one more reason why they're still unreconciled with Rome.
Blasphemy. It's only cool when Catholics are being mocked.
Robinson, the first openly gay bishop in the Episcopal Church, tweeted about the honor, ironically taking the Lord's name in vain in the process
"POTUS 'preaches' at the Easter prayer breakfast. Then, out of the blue, asks ME to close with prayer. OMG!" he tweeted with a picture.
Irony is Obama's Muslim buddies stoning homosexuals like Robinson to death.
It's high time Catholics took a page out of their playbook. Maybe then we'll get some respect.
And we'd better bring back the Holy Inquisition. Before it's too late.
Can you guess that homosexuality was involved?
Of course you can.
But, what you can't do is repeat Church teaching on homosexuality in a Catholic school. Because then the tolerance crowd goes batshit insane.
Political correctness took an ugly turn last week when a Catholic nun was excoriated for lecturing against same-sex unions at a Catholic high school in North Carolina.
And the outrage didn't come from the left, but from students and parents.
Sister Jane Dominic Laurel told students that homosexuality is not so much a biological trait as a result of psychological factors often prompted by environmental conditions, like being raised by same-sex parents. She used studies and data to back up her claims, according to Breitbart News.
Sister Laurel, a Nashville Dominican nun with a doctorate in theology from the Pontifical University in Rome, has often lectured on church doctrine, which teaches that homosexuality is a sin. She normally teaches at Aquinas College, but often guest lectures at high schools across the country.
Judging by how the students and parents reacted, that Catholic school is "catholic" in name only.
Students and parents from the Charlotte-area school were incensed.
Nearly 1,000 parents met at the school Wednesday to address complaints. The assembly was closed to the public, but social media posts described it as "often heated, with emotions running high on both sides," the Charlotte Observer reported.
The students reacted like good little prog-bots, and flushed 12 years of religious education down the toilet in the process.
"We the students of Charlotte Catholic High School would like to issue a formal complaint regarding Sr. Jane Dominic [Laurel]'s speech," according to an online petition. "We believe that same sex couples have the ability to raise happy, well-adjusted and successful children … We believe that homosexual couples are capable of monogamy. As rational people, we know that most homosexual people lead healthy, normal and productive lives like their heterosexual counterparts."
What they don't "know," apparently, is the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
I blame the school. And, of course, the parents.
But wait, it gets "better." Sister's lecture elicited cries of "bullying."
Susan Traynor of Matthews, whose son is a sophomore, said he is usually pretty quiet when she picks him up from Charlotte Catholic High.
But on the day Laurel spoke to the assembly, she said, he spoke right up when he got in the car.
"He said, 'We had the worst assembly today,' " Traynor recalled. He said he tried to leave with some others, but they were made to sit down. There are students in this school who are openly gay and some who are not out yet. Obviously, they felt bullied."
Let's say that again. Catholic teaching is bullying.
I told you guys this day would come. I just didn't expect it to be greeted with enthusiasm by Sister's own superiors. Aquinas College has placed Sister Jane Dominic on sabbatical, so that the students at Charlotte Catholic High School can "begin a process of healing and renewal."
One needs "healing" when confronted with Church teaching? No. One needs Confession. Please, Catholics of Charlotte, go to Confession. You'll find all the "healing" you need right there. For free.
Father Z is dismayed.
Did Sister actually say things that were so outrageous, so unacceptable, so lacking in truth and in charity, that the resulting furor was appropriate, proportionate and justified? Really?
It seems to me that this sad episode is one of many which reveal the building in our midst of a mob mentality akin to that which drove the Salem Witch Trials. If you speak in public now with any clarity about the Church's teachings on sexuality, marriage, etc., or avert to conclusions which rational people reach about the same derived from the Natural Law, you will be met with fury. "I saw Lizzie Procter speaking with the devil!" Well. bad example, since most of the people who will join the snarling pack likely don't believe in the devil.
Ah, but the devil works through them.
There is a new and twisted "normal" coalescing. This new "normal", violating the dictates of reason, will prompt the more aggressive and ideologically driven to impose iron norms, which, when violated, will spark vicious attacks from the now easily manipulated mob.
Brendan Eich can relate, Father. The mob got him too.
Because the goal of homosexual rights is the extermination of religion. The
gang which claims to be advocates for "love" (in all its gender-non-specific
forms) turns out to be the biggest bunch of haters that ever lived. We are in
a totalitarian death spiral, and it is indeed demonic.
It's no surprise that Obamabot Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor would be skeptical of any challenge to Holy Obamacare. But their arrogant dismissal of Hobby Lobby's religious objections is one for the books.
During oral arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday which focused on whether the contraceptive mandate in the Affordable Care Act violates the free exercise of religion, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan suggested employers who have moral objections to birth control should not provide health care coverage for their employees. "But isn't there another choice nobody talks about, which is paying the tax, which is a lot less than a penalty and a lot less than — than the cost of health insurance at all?"
Sotomayor said during the presentation by attorney Paul Clement, who represents Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties, two companies that sued the federal government over the requirement that businesses provide health insurance plans that cover contraceptives, including abortion-inducing drugs.
"Those employers could choose not to give health insurance and pay not that high a penalty — not that high a tax," Sotomayor said.
Clement said Hobby Lobby would pay more than $500 million per year in penalties, but Kagan disagreed.
"No, I don't think that that's the same thing, Mr. Clement," Kagan said. "There's one penalty that is if the employer continues to provide health insurance without this part of the coverage, but Hobby Lobby would choose not to provide health insurance at all."
"And in that case Hobby Lobby would pay $2,000 per employee, which is less that Hobby Lobby probably pays to provide insurance to its employees," Kagan said. "So there is a choice here. It's not even a penalty by — in the language of the statute. It's a payment or a tax. There's a choice."
Some choice! A tax on Christianity. Wow, there's something the Founding Fathers really fought and died for, eh? Pay the government to retain what little Freedom you have left.
It's a lot like the Jizya, the blood money Muslims demand of infidels so they'll leave us alone.
Obamacare, it's the New Sharia!
Kagan and Sotomayor will graciously grant us the permission to practice our
religion, if we bow down and submit to their munificence first. Because to
them we are all Obamacare
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof …
Apparently in the original text there's a heretofore undiscovered asterisk or two.
Because homosexuality is our de facto national religion now.
And if its proponents have their way, the free exercise of religions which object to homosexuality will indeed be prohibited. (Except for Islam; the homofascists don't dare take on The Religion Of Peace™.)
There are two news items today which exhibit my thesis.
In Virginia, a federal judge has invalidated a state constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex "marriage."
Because obviously (a) the Fourteenth Amendment was intended for such a purpose, and (b) never mind the will of voters expressed in a referendum.
The ruling cites memorable Supreme Court travesties — Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Lawrence v. Texas and Windsor v. U.S. — like so many mileposts on the Highway to Hell, and who can argue with such sophistry when it's dressed up in costumes of legal precedent, bejeweled with a lot of emotional chatter about "loving, intimate and lasting relationships" and "sacred, personal choices"?
The sinful is now sacred? How's that for peeing on us Christians' cornflakes?
Try your schtick in a mosque and get back to me. That is, if your head is still attached to your body.
Meanwhile in Kansas, their state legislature moved to protect religious liberty.
A House bill directed at same-sex couples in Kansas who are denied services tied to weddings and civil unions passed Wednesday with Republicans arguing the measure reinforced religious freedom and Democrats labeling it a discriminatory assault on lesbians and gays.
Why is it that homosexual demands for special attention are never characterized as a discriminatory assault on religious liberty?
The GOP-led House voted 72-49 to approve House Bill 2453 with little commentary following lengthy debate Tuesday. The bill sent to the Senate was designed to shield people, groups and businesses that cite religious reasons for refusing to serve homosexuals engaging in activities viewed as religiously offensive.
Note that it doesn't say you can't do it. It just says we don't have to help you.
The bill allows government employees of the state, courts, schools and law enforcement agencies to treat as invalid the civil unions or marriages of two men or two women.
Go ahead, pretend to be "married." We're still not going to applaud.
Legislators supportive of the legislation were motivated by an assumption the federal courts eventually would declare unconstitutional a 2005 amendment to the Kansas Constitution banning gay marriage.
Wouldn't it be great if all these judges who are mesmerized by emanations of penumbras would actually read the Tenth Amendment?
Gov. Sam Brownback said when asked about the bill that he had dedicated himself to fighting for basic human rights, including religious liberty, in many countries and for many different faiths.
"Americans have constitutional rights, among them the right to exercise their religious beliefs and the right for every human life to be treated with respect and dignity," the Republican governor said.
The homosexuals demand respect from us. But they refuse to respect our beliefs in return. Their disdain for religion pours forth — we are "anti-gay" purveyors of "vicious discrimination" out to turn back the clock on civil rights.
Such hysteria is underwhelming. The oft-cited example of homofascism at its worst is the Colorado baker who politely refuse to participate in the charade of a same-sex "marriage." Adhering to his conscience was quickly redefined as "hate." As if a random sole proprietor has the power to prevent two homosexuals from fully enjoying their chosen lifestyle.
This notion that a business has to cater to every customer's whim is preposterous. Several years ago my daughter wanted a Club Penguin birthday cake. We went to arguably the best bakery in town. "Sorry," he said, "I can't make that."
You'll be shocked to learn we didn't sue him.
And I'll bet you can't guess that we found a different bakery willing to create the cake she wanted.
Kansas isn't saying you can't have your cake. Kansas is saying that you might need to find a bakery that wants to make it for you. Then, everybody's happy. The religious baker's conscience is clear. The guy who made your cake has a few extra bucks in his pocket. And contrary to hyperbole, you have your cake.
So chill out. You live your lives. We'll live ours. If perchance our paths
cross, let's smile, nod, and move on. That's my definition of "tolerance."
Hopefully it's yours too.
Msgr. Desmond noted that unpleasant statistic during yesterday's homily. He was speaking, of course, about the Obama Administration's single-minded war on the Catholic Church, and their recent attacks on the Little Sisters of the Poor.
Surely the government can't wipe out the Church, he asked rhetorically, before citing the French Revolution as an example of how yes, yes it can.
And my mind whirled, because this president is certainly as sinister as Robespierre and the Jacobins. Perhaps moreso.
They had the guillotine, Obama has the IRS. It's only a matter of time before he uses the taxman to force us into performing gay "marriages." How could a man who demands that nuns pay for birth control resist the urge to bend Catholic priests to his will?
And so, thinking about Msgr. Desmond's homily, this description of the French Revolution sounds like it could have come right out of a DNC press release:
The new rational state, whose primary ideological plank was that the sovereignty of "the people" is unlimited, attempted to eliminate French traditions, norms, and religious beliefs.
The revolutionary governing bodies were particularly determined to destroy every vestige of the Roman Catholic Church because France was hailed by Rome as the Church's "eldest daughter" and the monarch had dedicated "our person, our state, our crown and our subjects" to the Blessed Virgin.
The Constituent Assembly began the campaign against the Church by stating in the Declaration of the Rights of Man, "no body or individual may exercise any authority which does not proceed directly from the nation." In other words the Church could no longer have any say in public matters. The secular state would now have the final word over every aspect of human and social life.
Cradle to grave statism, Obama-style!
The government will redefine family, and malevolently put the Catholic Church out of the adoption business because it won't go along.
The government will dictate the terms of your health care, and more importantly suppress any attempt by the Church to influence your choices. They'll even trot out misguided catholics to reassure you that open schism with Rome is The American Way.
Who will be the first Catholic priest Obama locks up?
Don't say it's an unthinkable prospect. The Reign of Terror was unthinkable
too. Until it wasn't.
Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court (temporarily, at least) sided with the Little Sisters of the Poor and against the Obama Administration.
Despite the best efforts of the Obama Administration, the Supreme Court of the United States decided on Friday afternoon to temporarily block enforcement of the Affordable Care Act on behalf of the Little Sisters of the Poor. The new ruling allows the religious order to avoid the crushing penalties of failing to adhere to the mandate while their legal challenge proceeds by informing the HHS in writing that they are a non-profit group "that hold themselves out as religious and have religious objections to providing coverage for contraceptive services."
The ruling comes after lawyers for the nuns pointed out that in order to claim their exemption, the administration is requiring the nuns to sign a "permission slip" that would allow their insurance company to offer coverage of contraception, abortion-inducing drugs, and sterilization over the nuns' objections.
The Sisters argue that participating in the process in any way would make them party to mortal sin. Even the fact that the government would pay the insurer for the coverage, and so costs would not fall on the Sisters, fails to address this concern, they say.
An earlier ruling by Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor allowing the Little Sisters protection from enforcement of the mandate was challenged by the Obama Administration.
Forcing nuns to purchase birth control and abortion services is evil.
Reiterating that demand in legal challenges is malevolent and cruel.
But it's typical of the Obama Administration's war on religion, and on Catholics specifically. They need to crush our faith, and replace it with their secularized worldview, because we stand in silent rejoinder of their sinfulness.
Contrary to feminut hysteria, we have no intention of forcing anyone to abide by our rules. Birth control is widely available, and inexpensively priced. It's none of our business if a woman chooses to purchase it with her own money. We will, of course, pray that she does not. But alas, she is free to ignore our prayers.
All we ask is that we remain free to exercise our religion and live our
faith without endangering our immortal souls. I don't think that's an
unreasonable request. And I'm heartened to hear that the Supreme Court
is inclined to agree with us.
God save us from the "hegemonic uniformity" of the "one line of thought", "fruit of the spirit of the world that negotiates everything", even the faith. This was Pope Francis' prayer during mass this morning at Casa Santa Marta, commenting on a passage from the Book of Maccabees, in which the leaders of the people do not want Israel to be isolated from other nations, and so abandon their traditions to negotiate with the king.
They go to "negotiate" and are excited about it. It is as if they said "we are progressives; let's follow progress like everyone else does." As reported by Vatican Radio, the Pope noted that this is the "spirit of adolescent progressivism" according to which "any move forward and any choice is better than remaining within the routine of fidelity." These people, therefore, negotiate "loyalty to God who is always faithful" with the king. "This is called apostasy", "adultery." They are, in fact, negotiating their values, "negotiating the very essence of being faithful to the Lord."
"And this is a contradiction: we do not negotiate values, but faithfulness. And this is the fruit of the devil, the prince of this world, who leads us forward with the spirit of worldliness. And then there are the direct consequences. They accepted the habits of the pagan, then a further step: the king wrote to his whole kingdom that all should be one people, and everyone would abandon their customs. A globalizing conformity of all nations is not beautiful, rather, each with own customs but united, but it is the hegemonic uniformity of globalization, the single line of thought. And this single line of thought is the result of worldliness."
Progressivism replaces God with The State, and Jesus with the state's sovereign. But the state is a false god, because in order to give to one, the state must take from another. Yet God gives freely to all.
American (small-c) catholics who are in bed with the state will not like hearing
these truths. But His Holiness speaks truth nonetheless.
Unanimously, the Bishops emphatically decree: We Will Not Comply.
The nation's Catholic bishops have a message for President Barack Obama: They would rather pay fines, no matter how much they would be, before they comply with the HHS mandate that compels groups to pay for birth control and drugs that may cause abortions.
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops today issued a "Special Message" at the conclusion of their fall General Assembly, November 13, in Baltimore. They unanimously passed the special message, which can only be issued as such meetings and strongly condemned the HHS mandate.
They said that, with its "coercive mandate," the Obama administration "is refusing to uphold its obligation to respect the rights of religious believers."
"Beginning in March 2012, in United for Religious Freedom, we identified three basic problems with the HHS mandate: it establishes a false architecture of religious liberty that excludes our ministries and so reduces freedom of religion to freedom of worship; it compels our ministries to participate in providing employees with abortifacient drugs and devices, sterilization, and contraception, which violates our deeply-held beliefs; and it compels our faithful people in business to act against our teachings, failing to provide them any exemption at all," they said.
Unlike the Nuns On The Bus and their cafeteria-catholicism this Special
Message carries with it the full weight of the Magisterium of the Roman
Catholic Church. So, as a lawyer friend always writes at the end of her
correspondence to a client, please be guided accordingly.