WyBlog, the best thing about New Jersey since the invention of the 24 hour diner.
Chris Wysocki
Caldwell, NJ
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." - Ronald Reagan
Linkiest
CH 2.0 Info Center
The Jersey Report
Labor Union Report
Memeorandum
Net Right Nation
The Patriot Post Newsletter
Pajamas Media
PJTV
Victor Davis Hanson
J! E! T! S! Jets! Jets! Jets!
OpenVMS.org Portal
AVS Forum
NJ.com Caldwell Forum
The Caldwells Patch
The Jersey Tomato Press
"This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, social issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes."
Our nuclear arsenal will get significantly smaller today when the last B53 nuclear bomb is dismantled by the Department of Energy.
The last of the United States' most powerful nuclear bombs — a weapon hundreds of times stronger than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima — is being disassembled nearly half a century after it was put into service at the height of the Cold War.
The final components of the B53 bomb will be broken down Tuesday at the Pantex Plant near Amarillo, Texas, the nation's only nuclear weapons assembly and disassembly facility. The completion of the dismantling program is a year ahead of schedule, according to the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, and aligns with President Barack Obama's goal of reducing the number of nuclear weapons.
First put into service in 1962, when Cold War tensions peaked during the Cuban Missile Crisis, the B53 weighed 10,000 pounds and was the size of a minivan.
The B53 was designed to destroy facilities deep underground, and it was carried by B-52 bombers.
I suppose the peaceniks will say that we're "safer" now. On the other hand,
isn't there a hostile nation with a facility "deep underground" that's the
cause of much consternation as of late? And isn't that nation led by an
apocalyptic madman hell-bent on initiating a nuclear war? Wouldn't we want
some kind of credible deterrent at the ready, and maybe a surefire way to send
their holy warriors off to meet Allah before they go and get all jihadi on
us?
Personally I think that we're about to be caught with our pants down, and there won't be anything left in reserve to save our sorry asses.
Then there's this:
Since it was made using older technology by engineers who have since retired or died, developing a disassembly process took time. Engineers had to develop complex tools and new procedures to ensure safety.
When it comes to how to make these things, we forgot. How's that for planning ahead? We can take it apart, but like Humpty Dumpty all the King's horses and all the King's men can't put the B53 back together again.
Sure, I feel much safer now.
Posted at 09:50 by Chris Wysocki
[/news]
Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags:
B53
nuclear-weapon
atomic-bomb
cold-war
|
Tweet
Previous: It's almost like they expected the guys dispensing "medical" marijuana to be Boy Scouts | Next: Elizabeth Warren, Grandma to Occupy Wall Street |
Main |