<?xml version="1.0"?>

<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     >

  <channel>
    <title>WyBlog</title>
    <link>http://wyblog.us/blog</link>
    <atom:link href="http://wyblog.us/blog/index.rss20" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>WyBlog, the best thing about New Jersey since the invention of the 24 hour diner.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright (c) 2017 Christopher H. Wysocki</copyright>

    

    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:12:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>

    <item>
      <title>We&apos;re #1! Again! Yup, Essex County, NJ has the highest property taxes in the nation!</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/were-nbr-1-again-for-property-taxes.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
I gotta be insane to live 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/04/nj_still_has_highest_property_taxes_in_nation_stud.html#incart_river_home">
here</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Once again, New Jersey had the highest property taxes in the nation last year.
</p>
<p>
Of the nine counties in the country where the average bill exceeded $10,000, 
four are in New Jersey: Essex, Union, Morris and Bergen.
</p>
<p>
Essex County property owners were saddled with the highest taxes, at an 
average of $11,550.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Man, I remember the days when my property taxes were only eleven grand a year.
</p>

<p>
Good times. 
</p>

<p>
Seven years ago a fellow named Chris Christie came along and said if I voted
for him he'd tame the property tax monster. I wonder what ever happened to that
guy? I heard he tried to run for president, and then something about him feeling 
sorry for drug addicts. 
</p>

<p>
Maybe the tax relief thing slipped his mind.
</p>

<p>
All I know is this kind of "winning" isn't what I signed up for.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NJ-Politics" rel="tag">NJ-Politics</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/property-taxes" rel="tag">property-taxes</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Essex-County" rel="tag">Essex-County</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">were-nbr-1-again-for-property-taxes</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>If at first you don&apos;t repeal Obamacare, try doing it the right way</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/obamacare/if-at-first-you-dont-repeal.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
TrumpRyanRinoCare was doomed from the get-go.
</p>

<p>
We didn't elect these clowns so they could enact Obamacare Lite.
</p>

<p>
And we surely didn't expect "repeal" would turn out to be "keep all the bad
stuff."
</p>

<p>
So as you all know by now, 
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/24/live-blog-gop-health-care-bill-teeters-as-republican-leaders-scramble-for-votes.html">
Paul Ryan pulled his American Health Care Act</a> before it could go down in 
flames in the House.
</p>

<p>
The Democrats, and their media allies, would have you believe this was a
defeat for "repeal" and a victory for Obamacare.
</p>

<p>
Nothing could be further from the truth.
</p>

<p>
The House Freedom Caucus torpedoed the bill, and I assure you, they are no
fans of Obamacare.
</p>

<p>
They killed it because it did not do the one thing we elected a GOP House, a 
GOP Senate, and a GOP president to do &mdash; <em>repeal Obamacare</em>, all 
of Obamacare.
</p>

<p>
They know how to do that, of course, 
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/01/08/obama-vetoes-gop-attempt-repeal-obamacare/78506800/">
They did it last year</a>. The GOP House and the GOP Senate passed a clean 
Obamacare repeal bill, which was promptly vetoed by then-president Obama.
</p>

<p>
One has to wonder where their courage went.
</p>

<p>
Or was the clean repeal bill just for show?
</p>

<p>
Because the easiest way to fulfill Donald Trump's campaign promise is to
simply pass 
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/01/06/house-sends-president-bill-repeal-obamacare-defund-planned-parenthood/78359292/">
that bill</a> again.
</p>

<p>
In addition to repealing Obamacare the Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom
Act of 2015 defunded the charnal houses of Planned Parenthood. That's what I
call a win-win piece of legislation.
</p>

<p>
But with a Republican in the White House the House GOP got cold feet.
</p>

<p>
So they crafted a version of Obamacare Lite, less satisfying, but with
<a href="http://dailysignal.com/2017/03/23/to-lower-premiums-congress-must-roll-back-obamacare-regulations/">
the same onerous provisions</a>.
</p>

<p>
Slacker millenials can keep their parents' insurance? Why? Don't mandate it;
don't ban it either. That way mom and dad can keep little Poindexter on their
insurance until he's 65 if they want, and they're willing to pay for it. But
the rest of us who actually understand responsibility aren't subsidizing his
social disease lab tests.
</p>

<p>
Pre-existing conditions? Listen up, that's called "pay my bills." Look, I get
it, sick people don't want to go broke. But sorry if I sound harsh, that's
not <em>my</em> problem. Sure the truly sick need a safety net, and why not
model it on the national flood insurance program instead of sticking you and
me with the bill?
</p>

<p>
In fact, deregulate all health insurance. Set it up on the catastrophic care
model &mdash; you pay for the routine stuff and the insurance kicks in when
the bills get out of hand. That's how car insurance works; the insurance
company doesn't pay for your gas and oil changes. So why should your health
insurance pay when your kid has a cold?
</p>

<p>
A health care system where people pay their own damned bills is a health care
system that will constrain costs. Doctors and hospitals and labs that charge
"too much" will go out of business. We shop around for food and phone service
and clothing and entertainment, but we don't even stop to consider the cost
when we visit a doctor or pick up a prescription. Why?
</p>

<p>
Since I was knee-high to a grasshopper I've heard Republican politicians
tout the need for Association Health Plans and selling insurance across state
lines. Then there's tort reform, so the next John Edwards can't get rich
exploiting vulnerable women. Why didn't RyanCare incorporate those features?
</p>

<p>
Beats me. But my guess is his donors didn't like the sound of Freedom.
</p>

<p>
Fox News posted that Donald Trump is "open" to a new health care bill. Here's 
my advice. 
</p>

<p>
Repeal Obamacare. <em>All</em> of Obamacare.
</p>

<p>
Then craft a replacement that emphasizes Freedom.
</p>

<p>
Freedom to choose our doctors.
</p>

<p>
Freedom to choose the coverages we want. No mandates. 
</p>

<p>
Freedom to pay cash if we desire to forego health insurance.
</p>

<p>
Freedom to determine our own destiny.
</p>

<p>
Freedom to <em>fail</em>, if that's what we chose to do. Because the 
Constitution wasn't designed to save us from ourselves.
</p>

<p>
Remember, the Constitution guarantees the <em>pursuit</em> of happiness;
not <em>actual</em> happiness. That's up to you.
</p>

<p>
And I must say, a health care system that is built upon the idea of personal
responsibility is a health care system that is sustainable, affordable, and
inherently fair.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obamacare" rel="tag">Obamacare</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Paul-Ryan" rel="tag">Paul-Ryan</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Donald-Trump" rel="tag">Donald-Trump</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/AHCA" rel="tag">AHCA</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/House-Freedom-Caucus" rel="tag">House-Freedom-Caucus</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/obamacare</category>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">if-at-first-you-dont-repeal</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Repeal and Replace? Nah, the GOP plan is more like Obamacare Lite</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/obamacare/gop-plan-is-obamacare-lite.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Has anyone seen free market health care reform? I seem to recall a certain
political party promising free market health care reform if Donald Trump
won the presidency.
</p>

<p>
Instead they delivered 
<a href="https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/03/06/rand-paul-i-will-not-vote-for-obamacare-lite/">
Obamacare Lite</a>.
</p>

<p>
There are plenty of posts out there 
<a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2017/03/07/23-things-need-to-know-about-republican-obamacare-replacement-bill.html">
summarizing</a> the new GOP American Health
Care Act, so I won't rehash them here.
<a href="http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/03/what-will-gopcare-change/">
This one by Kemberlee Kaye</a> is pretty good.
</p>

<p>
So let's get right into the objections.
</p>

<p>
Refundable tax credits are just subsidies by another name. Replacing one
entitlement with another is not my definition of "reform."
</p>

<p>
Paul Ryan is touting his Medicaid cuts, but what he isn't telling you is that
he's replacing them with a $100 Billion dollar slush fund for "high risk"
state by state insurance pools. Meh. That's a lot of cash that'll be easy
pickings for sticky-fingered bureaucrats. And it's not "saving" us anything.
</p>

<p>
But I could probably live with this plan <em>if</em> that's all it does in
"repealing" Obamacare. Alas, the GOP definition of "repeal" must be different
from mine, because they're retaining 3 of Obamacare's core provisions.
</p>

<p>
Lazy slackers will still get to sponge off their parents' insurance up through
age 26. Sheesh, by age 26 I owned my first house and wouldn't have dreamed of
saddling my parents with my bills. Why are today's twenty-somethings different?
</p>

<p>
And speaking of saddling someone else with your bills, the ridiculous
pre-existing condition mandate remains in force. Look, for the 127,415th time,
"insurance" for pre-existing conditions is merely a way for forcing me into
paying your bills. When you have a pre-existing condition your costs are
known, but Obamacare lite refuses to price your plan accordingly.
</p>

<p>
Now Paul Ryan et al do make one sop to reality here, if you have a pre-existing
condition they require you to maintain continuous coverage or pay a 30% 
penalty. Which is good as far as it goes, but it still means you're rated
as if you're not already sick when you're up for renewal. No actuary in his
right mind would sign off on that.
</p>

<p>
Lastly, and most worrisome, Obamacare Lite <em>preserves</em> the ten
minimum essential benefits mandate at the heart of Obamacare's escalating 
cost structure. So no, we can't choose the plan that's right for us,
because every plan will still be required to cover "free" mammograms
and birth control, pediatric dental (essential for a 59 year old guy
like me!), and a laundry list of feel-good "preventative" services
like diet counseling and anti-smoking incentives.
</p>

<p>
So much for being able to once again purchase a catastrophic care plan
and self-insure for the routine stuff.
</p>

<p>
For that matter Obamacare Lite leaves out all the free-market reforms
Republicans have said they wanted. Insurance still won't be sold across
state lines, preserving 51 petty fiefdoms and forcing insurers to create
a multitude of similar yet distinct plans. There are no association health
plans either, which is yet another way for individuals to band together and
reduce costs. And nowhere in this bill is any mention of tort reform.
</p>

<p>
Frankly I don't see this plan reducing my costs at all. It's essentially
<a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2616636">
a full surrender to the forces of permanent liberalism</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
I've already shared my skepticism that the bill, which doesn't actually start 
repealing the major spending provisions of Obamacare until the 2020 presidential 
election, would actually end up repealing much in practice. But for the sake of 
argument, let's just assume the plan gets implemented exactly as written.
</p>
<p>
Supporters of the bill could argue that it does make changes to Obamacare &mdash;
repealing taxes, reducing spending, and scaling back some mandates and regulations. 
There are even a few areas in which one could argue the bill moves health 
policy in a more conservative direction relative to the pre-Obamacare status 
quo. It provides for expanded health savings accounts and, though it would 
spend more money than otherwise would have been the case before Obamacare, it 
would overhaul Medicaid into a program in which states are given a per capita 
grant and provided the flexibility to run their own programs.
</p>
<p>
But at the same time, the GOP bill preserves much of the regulatory structure 
of Obamacare; leaves the bias in favor of employer healthcare largely intact; 
replaces Obamacare's subsidies with a different subsidy scheme; and still 
supports higher spending for Medicaid relative to what was the case before 
Obamacare.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Big Government Republicans are just as execrable as Big Government Democrats.
And what we have here is a product of Big Government Republicans.
</p>

<p>
We can do better.
</p>

<p>
We <em>must</em> do better.
</p>

<p>
Repeal Obamacare, <em>in its entirety</em>.
</p>

<p>
Then, open health care to the free market. Stop treating health <em>insurance</em>
as if it's health <em>care</em>. Trust people to decide what services and 
benefits they want to pay for. Free doctors from reams of regulations and 
let them practice medicine. It's easy if you try.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obamacare" rel="tag">Obamacare</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/health-insurance" rel="tag">health-insurance</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/health-care" rel="tag">health-care</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Paul-Ryan" rel="tag">Paul-Ryan</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/GOP" rel="tag">GOP</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/obamacare</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">gop-plan-is-obamacare-lite</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The IRS and Humana put two more nails into Obamacare&apos;s coffin</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/obamacare/irs-humana-accelerate-death-spiral.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Thanks to a recent Executive Order from President Trump 
<a href="http://reason.com/blog/2017/02/14/irs-blow-to-obamacare-individual-mandate">
the Obamacare individual mandate is no longer mandatory</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Following President Donald Trump's executive order instructing agencies to 
provide relief from the health law, the Internal Revenue Service appears to 
be taking a more lax approach to the coverage requirement.
</p>
<p>
The health law's individual mandate requires everyone to either maintain 
qualifying health coverage or pay a tax penalty, known as a "shared 
responsibility payment." The IRS was set to require filers to indicate 
whether they had maintained coverage in 2016 or paid the penalty by filling 
out line 61 on their form 1040s. Alternatively, they could claim exemption 
from the mandate by filing a form 8965.
</p>
<p>
For most filers, filling out line 61 would be mandatory. The IRS would not 
accept 1040s unless the coverage box was checked, or the shared responsibility 
payment noted, or the exemption form included. Otherwise they would be labeled 
"silent returns" and rejected.
</p>
<p>
Instead, however, filling out that line will be optional.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Yowza! The individual mandate is dead! And with it, the funding "glue" that
John Roberts decided was necessary to hold Obamacare together is gone, perhaps
for good.
</p>

<p>
And if this news isn't enough to bury Obamacare, how about one of the nation's
largest insurers 
<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/14/humana-says-it-plans-to-pull-out-of-obamacare-exchanges-in-2018.html">
pulling the plug</a> on the exchanges?
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
While Republicans continue to grapple with plans to repeal and replace 
Obamacare and stabilize health insurance rates, Humana is the first major 
insurer to say it is dropping out of the individual market for 2018.
</p>
<p>
"Based on our initial analysis of data associated with the company's 
health-care exchange membership following the 2017 open enrollment period, 
we continue to see further signs of an unbalanced risk pool," said Humana 
CEO Bruce Broussard, on a conference call with analysts Tuesday. "Therefore, 
the company has decided that it cannot continue to offer this coverage for 
2018."
</p>
</div>

<p>
Translation &mdash; we're losing too much money on old, sick people. Which
is what everyone with a brain said would happen when Harry Reid and Nancy
Pelosi foisted this debacle onto us. 
</p>

<p>
Did they listen? No. And so here we are, in the final stages of Obamacare's
<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/obamacare-market-death-spiral-aetna-mark-bertolini-235041">
death spiral</a>.
</p>

<p>
All we need to do now is wait, and get ready for 
<a href="http://www.thehill.com/policy/healthcare/319708-gop-lawmakers-back-obamacare-replacement">
the GOP replacement</a>, coming soon to a congressional committee hearing room 
near you.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obamacare" rel="tag">Obamacare</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/IRS" rel="tag">IRS</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Humana" rel="tag">Humana</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/individual-mandate" rel="tag">individual-mandate</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/obamacare</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">irs-humana-accelerate-death-spiral</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>NJ Dems concoct a plan to soak taxpayers for federal dollars withheld from sanctuary cities</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/nj-dems-soak-taxpayers-for-sanctuary-cities.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Three New Jersey Democrats think they've found a sure-fire way to sidestep
President Trump's plan to withhold federal funds from sanctuary cities &mdash;
<a href="http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/2017/02/state_bill_would_fund_sanctuary_cities_denied_fede.html#incart_river_home">
have NJ taxpayers make up the difference</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
New Jersey lawmakers from immigrant-rich Hudson County on Tuesday announced a 
bill that would provide state aid to sanctuary cities denied federal funds for 
failing to comply with immigration rules.
</p>
<p>
The bill was introduced in both houses of the legislature on Tuesday by State 
Sen. Brian Stack, Assemblyman Raj Mukherji and Assemblywoman Annette Chaparro, 
all Democrats from the 33rd District.
</p>
<p>
The legislation, S-3007 in the Senate and A-4590 in the Assembly, would allow 
municipalities or counties denied federal funds to apply to the state Commissioner 
of Community Affairs for a "dollar-for-dollar" match to compensate for the 
withheld federal money. 
</p>
</div>

<p>
Let me put this in words you three turkeys can understand.
</p>

<p>
<i>No. Way. Jose.</i>
</p>

<p>
The people of Union City and the 33rd District may have voted for you, and you 
might think your loyalties lie more with illegal aliens and less with your 
taxpaying constituents, but that's not my problem, it's theirs. And I stand 
with President Trump in wanting to see equal enforcement of our immigration 
laws. Which means if anyone should be on the hook for your virtue signalling,
it's the people in your District, and not the rest of us. 
</p>

<p>
Then let's see how they feel about your activism when you're raiding their 
pockets. Because I'm thinking they're not gonna be too pleased.
</p>

<p>
Fortunately Governor Christie would be insane to sign this bill into law.
</p>

<p>
So it's all just grandstanding on the part of Hudson County progressives, for
now. But if NJ's voters are dumb enough to put Phil Murphy into the governor's
office next year then throwing tax dollars at illegal aliens will be the
least of our problems.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NJ-Politics" rel="tag">NJ-Politics</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Democrats" rel="tag">Democrats</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Sanctuary-Cities" rel="tag">Sanctuary-Cities</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/President-Trump" rel="tag">President-Trump</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 20:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">nj-dems-soak-taxpayers-for-sanctuary-cities</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The mayor of Prospect Parkistan, NJ lays out the welcome mat for illegals and jihadis</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/immigration/prospect-parkistan-welcomes-illegals-and-jihadis.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
I don't understand the idea of welcoming criminals into your town. But I'm
not a liberal. The mayor of Prospect Park, NJ is, and 
<a href="http://iotwreport.com/muslim-mayor-in-nj-signs-executive-order-protecting-illegals/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook">
he's opening the gates and beckoning the barbarians inside</a>.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Prospect Park Mayor, Mohamed T. Khairullah, signed an executive order to 
reassure residents that they will be protected from President Donald J. Trump's 
executive order to ban green card and visa holders, along with refugees, 
regardless of any resident's immigration status.
</p>

<p>
Break the law, we won't care!
</p>

<p>
His name's Mohamed, so I'm guessing if someone breaks <em>Sharia</em> law, he'll
care, a lot. Immigration law, not so much.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
In his executive order, he made it clear that all citizens, regardless if 
immigrant, refugee, green or visa card holder, are safe in Prospect Park and 
will not turn anyone to the federal government unless they have committed 
unlawful actions.
</p>

<p>
Yo, Chief, "citizens" implies "valid American." Ergo, no issue re immigration,
green cards, visas, or refugee status. On the other hand, overstaying a visa, 
or sneaking into the US, they're "unlawful actions." Really, you could look it 
up. Then there's jihad; it's pretty "unlawful" too, not that you'd rat out your 
friends, right?
</p>

<p>
So it looks like Prospect Parkistan is now a safe haven for anyone looking to 
hide out from DHS, no matter why. What could go wrong?

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Immigration" rel="tag">Immigration</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Muslims" rel="tag">Muslims</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/illegal-aliens" rel="tag">illegal-aliens</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Prospect-Park-NJ" rel="tag">Prospect-Park-NJ</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Donald-Trump" rel="tag">Donald-Trump</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/immigration</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 01:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">prospect-parkistan-welcomes-illegals-and-jihadis</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>It&apos;s official, President Trump&apos;s Extreme Vetting is now in effect</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/immigration/extreme-vetting-is-now-in-effect.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Barack Obama's open borders are closed until further notice.
</p>

<p>
Don't expect them to re-open any time soon either.
</p>

<p>
First there was The Wall, then President Trump signed an Executive Order today 
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/27/trump-signs-executive-order-for-extreme-vetting-refugees.html">
suspending visa entry</a> into the U.S. from seven countries known to harbor 
radical Islamic terrorists: Syria, Iran, Iraq, Somalia, Libya, Sudan and Yemen.
</p>

<p>
Naturally the usual suspects are aghast.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
American Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Anthony Romero blasted 
Trump's plan as unconstitutional.
</p>
<p>
"'Extreme vetting' is just a euphemism for discriminating against Muslims," 
Romero said in a statement issued moments after the signing. "Identifying 
specific countries with Muslim majorities and carving out exceptions for 
minority religions flies in the face of the constitutional principle that 
bans the government from either favoring or discriminating against particular 
religions."
</p>
</div>

<p>
The "minority religion" of which he speaks is, of course, Christianity. Lefties
<em>hate</em> Christians. And Barack Obama's government prevented persecuted
Christians living in majority Muslim countries from entering the U.S.
</p>

<p>
President Trump vows to reverse that punitive and ill-conceived policy.
Because "extreme vetting" should apply to the populations that breed
terrorists, not to the folks who are victims of Islamic terrorism.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
In an interview with CBN, Trump said persecuted Christians from Syria would 
get priority.
</p>
<p>
"They've been horribly treated. Do you know if you were a Christian in Syria 
it was impossible, at least very tough to get into the United States? If you 
were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost 
impossible."
</p>
</div>

<p>
And right on cue, a slowdown on Muslim immigration is labeled as a "ban."
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"These actions taken by Donald Trump are tantamount to a Muslim ban," Abed A. 
Ayoub, the legal and policy director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination 
Committee. "This is the Muslim ban that was promised by him on the campaign 
trail."
</p>

<p>
Yo Abed, quick, who's the policy director for the Saudi-Christian
Anti-Discrimination Committee?
</p>

<p>
I'll give you a hint. <em>If</em> he existed, he'd already be dead.
</p>

<p>
The U.S. Constitution guarantees that you, your gutter religion, and your
pedophile prophet's ramblings are free to associate anywhere, anytime,
anyhow. No one is "banning" Muslims. No one is shutting down your mosques
or taxing your congregants. There are no "Christianity police" forcing
hijab-wearing women to don bikinis.
</p>

<p>
And if you report a crime, you don't need to find 4 Christian witnesses 
before the police will take a report.
</p>

<p>
So tell me again how persecuted you are.
</p>

<p>
The plight of Christians in Muslim lands is real, and heart-breaking.
</p>

<p>
The "plight" of Muslims in the U.S. is known as the American Dream.
</p>

<p>
Pardon me if I don't feel bad for you.
</p>

<p>
And I won't apologize for wanting President Trump to help the thousands of
Christians your co-religionists are persecuting day and night. You wanna
help Muslim refugees? Call the Saudi embassy. Or call the Iranians, I hear
they're flush with cash thanks to your buddy the former president. But don't 
expect us to take in any more Muslims; we've already done are part. If you
don't like that, well, you're free to go back to Mecca.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/immigration" rel="tag">immigration</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/President-Trump" rel="tag">President-Trump</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Muslims" rel="tag">Muslims</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/refugees" rel="tag">refugees</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/immigration</category>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">extreme-vetting-is-now-in-effect</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>President Trump&apos;s inaugural address put the &quot;we&quot; back into We The People</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/president_trump/putting-we-back-in-we-the-people.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
The thing that struck me most about today is how President Trump kept saying
"we" and "us." Not "I." And not in the context of "this is not who <em>we</em>
are" either.
</p>

<p>
He's genuinely proud to be an American. He's ready to work <em>for</em> us.
</p>

<p>
As one of his first 3 official acts he signed an Executive Order proclaiming
a National Day of Patriotism. Pride in America is something we haven't seen
in at least 8 years. It's a nice feeling to have it back. Because America
<em>is</em> the greatest country on earth. America <em>is</em> special.
America <em>is</em> that shining city on a hill. 
</p>

<p>
To borrow a phrase, it's morning in America again.
</p>

<p>
The sun is shining. The birds are singing. And 
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/20/full-text-president-donald-trumps-inauguration-speech.html">
President Trump spoke eloquently</a>.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Today's ceremony, however, has very special meaning. Because today we are not 
merely transferring power from one Administration to another, or from one party 
to another &mdash; but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and 
giving it back to you, the American People.
</p>

<p>
This presidency isn't about him. It's about us.
</p>

<p>
He made it clear that he sees power in The People, not in Washington, DC,
and certainly not in himself.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
January 20th 2017, will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers 
of this nation again. 
</p>
<p>
The forgotten men and women of our country will be forgotten no longer.
</p>
</div>

<p>
He spoke with conviction. And sincerity.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
A nation exists to serve its citizens.
</p>

<p>
Such a simple, and yet immensely powerful truth. Has our nation served her
citizens? Or special interests? I think you know the answer.
</p>

<p>
And he issued a new decree, "to be heard in every city, in every foreign 
capital, and in every hall of power" &mdash; <em>America First</em>.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs, will be 
made to benefit American workers and American families.
</p>

<p>
America First. Write it down. Remember it.
</p>

<p>
Then he let us know that we're all in this together. That he will be the
president for <em>all</em> Americans.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.
</p>
<p>
The Bible tells us, "how good and pleasant it is when God's people live 
together in unity."
</p>
<p>
We must speak our minds openly, debate our disagreements honestly, but always 
pursue solidarity.
</p>
<p>
When America is united, America is totally unstoppable.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Again, simple words. Yet immensely powerful words too. America will be
unstoppable. America will be great again. Because The People will be united.
</p>

<p>
Donald Trump is the captain of our ship. And once a long time ago during my
childhood I watched a TV show where a different ship's captain captured the
essense of We The People.
</p>

<div class="indent">
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uGO-SldLrNA?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>

<p>
It is called Kirk's greatest speech, even if the episode itself is corny and
contrived. It's a speech that I believe Donald Trump would heartily endorse, 
because I heard echoes of James T. Kirk from him today.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
This was not written for chiefs. (general consternation) Hear me! Hear this! 
Among my people, we carry many such words as this from many lands, many worlds. 
Many are equally good and are as well respected, but wherever we have gone, no 
words have said this thing of importance in quite this way. Look at these three 
words written larger than the rest, with a special pride never written before 
or since. Tall words proudly saying <em>We The People</em>.
</p>

<p>
There's what this administration will proudly be all about. We. The. People.
</p>

<p>
God Bless America!

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/President-Trump" rel="tag">President-Trump</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/We-The-People" rel="tag">We-The-People</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/president_trump</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">putting-we-back-in-we-the-people</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Team Trump is preparing massive, &quot;dramatic&quot; cuts to the federal government</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/president_trump/massive-federal-budget-cuts-coming.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Donald Trump is determined to slash government spending. A lot. 
<a href="http://thehill.com/policy/finance/314991-trump-team-prepares-dramatic-cuts#.WIDGlJdHATs.twitter">
A preview of what's to come</a> reads like a conservative activist's greatest 
fantasies. And why not? Most of it comes directly from our friends at the
Heritage Foundation.
</p>

<p>
Every federal department will soon see its budget slashed and major programs 
eliminated. And get this, the first step will be to privatize the Corporation
for Public Broadcasting and completely abolish the National Endowment for
the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities!
</p>

<p>
Yes my friends, no more taxpayer-subsidized lefty propaganda masquerading as
"news" on NPR. No more cowboy poetry or homoerotic line drawings. "Artists"
and "journalists" who want to produce that kind of crap will have to find a 
sympathetic liberal billionaire to subdisize their sophistry.
</p>

<p>
The goal is to reduce federal spending by <em>$10.5 trillion</em> over 10 years.
</p>

<p>
To get there the State Department will say goodbye to the Overseas Private 
Investment Corporation and funding for the Paris Climate Change Agreement and 
the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The Justice
Department will shed the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 
Violence Against Women Grants, and the Legal Services Corporation. They'll
also see huge reductions in funding for their Civil Rights, Environment,
and Natural Resources divisions. And the Energy Department will roll back
most funding to 2008 levels while dropping the Office of Electricity, 
the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, and the misleadingly
named Office of Fossil Energy which is actually dedicated to phasing out
fossil fuels. Frack, Baby, Frack!
</p>

<p>
Four corporate welfare boondoggles are also on the chopping block: the Minority 
Business Development Agency, the Economic Development Administration, the 
International Trade Administration, and the Manufacturing Extension Partnership. 
</p>

<p>
That there is what those of us in the Drain The Swamp section call A Great Start.
</p>

<p>
But wait, it gets better! Because Trump has also pledged to reduce the entire
federal workforce through attrition by implementing a 
<a href="http://wjla.com/news/local/president-elect-trump-promises-to-order-federal-hiring-freeze-in-first-100-days">
hiring freeze</a>. The unionistas are apopleptic of course. They consider every 
single federal job to be <em>critical</em> for government to function. Guess 
what? They're wrong. 
</p>

<p>
There's a new sheriff in town and his two favorite words are "you're fired."
When it comes to our bloated federal bureaucracy that's music to my ears.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/President-Trump" rel="tag">President-Trump</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/federal-government" rel="tag">federal-government</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/government-spending" rel="tag">government-spending</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/president_trump</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">massive-federal-budget-cuts-coming</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Legislating from the bench: NJ Supreme Court again decrees towns must build more slums</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/njsc-decrees-build-more-slums.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Reality took a back seat to social engineering today when the New Jersey state
Supreme Court again 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/ocean/index.ssf/2017/01/nj_on_the_hook_for_200k_affordable_housing_units_s.html#incart_river_home">
unanimously ruled</a> that every town in our fair state is <em>required</em> 
to provide "affordable housing." And after consulting their abacus they set 
forth a number to be built forthwith &mdash; 200,000 units, paid for, 
of course, by you and me.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
New Jersey has to build thousands more units for its low-income residents to 
make up for the 16 years that the state didn't address those needs, the state 
Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/supreme/A116MvO.pdf">
In a decision addressing New Jersey's long-stalled regulations</a> governing 
affordable housing, the state's highest court said towns must take into 
consideration the need for housing that existed within their borders between 
1999 and 2015. That's the so-called gap period when the Council on Affordable 
Housing failed to adopt new rules.
</p>
<p>
The 6-0 decision, the latest in decades of Mount Laurel rulings governing 
affordable housing in New Jersey, rejects the assertion that only 37,000 units 
are needed and that the gap period calculations are not necessary because that 
need no longer exists.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Remember when Chris Christie was going to rein in our activist judiciary?
</p>

<p>
Yeah, me neither.
</p>

<p>
The premise of "affordable housing" itself is blatantly absurd. The social
justice warrior crowd unilaterally decided poor people "deserved" to live
in whatever town they wanted, regardless of whether or not that town's
real estate market was priced out of their reach. Because "fairness."
</p>

<p>
Apparently working for what you want takes too long, and equality of
outcome is better than equality of opportunity anyway. So, free houses
for everybody! Ain't socialism grand?
</p>

<p>
Is everyone entitled to a nice car and fancy clothes too? How about golf club 
memberships and Disney vacations? Where does all this "fairness" end?
</p>

<p>
Time was people bought starter houses. Or they rented apartments and saved
their pennies. And if you couldn't afford to live in Maplewood or Montclair
you settled for Newark or East Orange until you got a better job. That's
how my grandparents did it.
</p>

<p>
But nowadays folks want handouts, not a leg up. And why shouldn't they get
to live in Short Hills without paying what everyone else who lives there paid? 
Our black-robed poobahs agreed, and decided to put a slum in every neighborhood. 
Except theirs, of course.
</p>

<p>
So COAH is reincarnated, and high-density, low-quality, traffic-inducing,
school-overcrowding tenements will be foisted on us all. And not to put
too fine a point on it, but the inhabitants of these housing projects are
not always the most stellar of citizens, and they're not known for taking
pride in their surroundings. Plus they expect certain "services" to be readily 
available, and I'm not just talking about check-cashing outlets and 
cash-for-gold storefronts. Think exotic pharmaceuticals and short-term
female companionship, IYKWIMAITYD.
</p>

<p>
All of which slaughters property values and quality of life for those of us 
who were here first. 
</p>

<p>
But the affordable housing activists don't care about that. They don't even
actually care about "affordable housing." What they do care about are votes,
and even in this deeply blue state there are pockets of Republicans to be
infiltrated and subverted. Hence the imposition of affordable housing,
and the Democrats who inhabit it. Import enough new voters and even the
most conservative towns will flip to the Free Stuff side. And then the
tax gouging can really begin because hey, this is where the <em>rich guys</em>
live.
</p>

<p>
One of my Facebook friends is a former NJ resident who relocated to North
Carolina. Every time he sees another story about how NJ is screwing the
middle class he immediately adds the #GetOutNow hashtag. He has a point. 
Once the slums arrive it'll be too late.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NJ-Politics" rel="tag">NJ-Politics</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Mount-Laurel" rel="tag">Mount-Laurel</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/housing" rel="tag">housing</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/affordable-housing" rel="tag">affordable-housing</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 21:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">njsc-decrees-build-more-slums</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Liberal hypocrites bailing on inaugural gigs conveniently forget about &quot;Bake That Cake!&quot;</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/liberals/hypocrites-refuse-inaugural-gigs.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Here we go again. Liberal fascists scored another "victory" when the B Street
Band, a Bruce Springsteen cover group, 
<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/314475-springsteen-cover-band-cancels-inaugural-gig-out-of-respect-for-bruce">
reneged on their contract</a> to play at the New Jersey State Society's 
inaugural ball. Why? <em>President Trump</em>, that's why.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
The band announced the decision on Monday, after it said the planned appearance 
"generated a storm of national news, from New York to Los Angeles, particularly 
given Bruce Springsteen's clearly articulated feelings about President-elect 
Trump."
</p>
<p>
"Our decision is based SOLELY on the respect and gratitude we have for Bruce 
and the E Street Band," founder Will Forte, said in a statement.\
</p>
</div>

<p>
Naturally they're being applauded by All The Right People for their <em>bravery</em>.
Even as the organizers of the inaugural ball have to scramble to find a
replacement. But that's no biggie, right? Trump's illegitimate!
</p>

<p>
So riddle me this Batman. Why couldn't 
<a href="http://reason.com/blog/2015/04/02/was-memories-pizza-a-victim-of-irrespons">
Memories Pizza</a> decline to cater a same-sex "wedding?" Why couldn't the 
owners of 
<a href="http://www.redstate.com/diary/stridentconservative/2016/10/04/sweet-cakes-melissa-closed-good-gay-mafia/">
Sweet Cakes by Melissa</a> show respect for their religious beliefs by politely 
referring a homosexual couple to another bakery? Why can't a Christian wedding 
venue freely choose which weddings they'll host without fear of lynch-mob 
reprisals?
</p>

<p>
Because, <em>Tolerance!</em>
</p>

<p>
You know, the same <em>tolerance</em> that 
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/01/14/protests-shutdown-milo-yiannopoulos-pharma-bro-at-uc-davis.html">
ran Milo Yiannopoulos off the campus of UC Davis</a> last week. And the same
<em>tolerance</em> that forced Memories Pizza and Sweet Cakes by Melissa to 
close their doors for good. 
</p>

<p>
To the fascist Left, <em>tolerance</em> means death threats. <em>Tolerance</em>
means enforcing GroupThink. <em>Tolerance</em> means never having to associate
with someone whose views are different from their own.
</p>

<p>
And so the B Street Band joins 
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4120970/Opera-star-Andrea-Bocelli-backs-singing-Trump-s-inauguration-receiving-death-threats.html">
Andrea Bocelli</a> and 
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-inauguration-singer-idUSKBN14Y0SY">
Jennifer Holliday</a> in the Gay Mafia Hall Of Fame.
</p>

<p>
The rank hypocrisy is pathetic. When progressives stand up for their principles,
it's <em>bravery</em>, just ask Meryl Streep, one of the Bravest Of The Brave,
to hear her tell it.
</p>

<p>
But when Christians and conservatives stand up for <em>their</em> principles,
it's Hate Speech.
</p>

<p>
Which of course is just one more reason why Trump won.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Donald-Trump" rel="tag">Donald-Trump</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/B-Street-Band" rel="tag">B-Street-Band</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Jennifer-Holliday" rel="tag">Jennifer-Holliday</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/inaugural" rel="tag">inaugural</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/liberals" rel="tag">liberals</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/liberals</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">hypocrites-refuse-inaugural-gigs</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>NJ&apos;s two senators don&apos;t exactly crown themselves with glory grilling Trump&apos;s nominees</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/democrats/booker-menendez-tag-team-morons.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
When your two US Senators are Democrats you're bound to be repeatedly 
embarrassed by their antics. But sheesh, Cory Booker and Bob Menendez 
really outdid themselves today.
</p>

<p>
Booker broke with 228 years of tradition and became the first sitting US 
Senator to publicly speak out against the confirmation of his colleague
Jeff Sessions as Attorney General. Why? 
<a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/01/11/senate-showdown-real-reason-cory-booker-testified-against-jeff-sessions.html">
Because he's running for president in 2020</a>, and he's a horse's ass.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
As Democrats look to regroup after their unexpected loss to Trump, Booker's 
name has been floated as a potential front-runner to lead the Democratic Party's 
presidential bid in 2020. Publicity is likely a big motivator behind Booker's 
commitment to thrust his own views of Sessions into the spotlight.
</p>

<p>
He's gotta appear to be more radical than Lizzie "Fauxcahontas" Warren. And
face it, the libtard wing of the Democratic party eats this shit up. Too bad
he's an empty suit, with little appeal outside of New Jersey and other
coastal enclaves. And then there's the small matter of his entanglement with
the rampant corruption in the Newark Watershed Commission, where his protege
Linda Watkins-Brashear 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/essex/index.ssf/2015/12/ex-watershed_director_indicted.html">
pleaded guilty</a> to multiple felonies involving bribery and official 
misconduct. Not to mention his 
<a href="http://nypost.com/2013/08/11/newark-mayor-cory-booker-pocketed-confidential-annual-payouts-from-law-firm-while-in-office/">
sweetheat deal</a> with his old law firm of Trenk, DiPasquale wherein they 
continued to pay him a salary when he was mayor of Newark while he steered 
lucrative no-bid city contracts their way.
</p>

<p>
It's like the Clinton Foundation, only without the foreign "investments."
(<i>Ah, give him time, I'm sure he can rustle up a few checks from the United
Arab Emirates</i>. -- Ed.)
</p>

<p>
Cory Booker won't be president. Of that I can assure you.
</p>

<p>
Meanwhile, his partner in mendacity, Bob Menendez, was busy 
<a href="http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/01/11/dem-senator-compares-trumps-border-wall-to-the-berlin-wall-at-tillerson-confirmation/">
making a fool of himself</a> questioning Secretary of State nominee Rex 
Tillerson. Bob wanted to know why Tillerson supported Trump's border wall with 
Mexico.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
I also want to point out that the last time a country tried to wall itself 
completely from its neighbor was in Berlin in 1961, and that wall was 
constructed by communist East Germany.
</p>

<p>
Wow.
</p>

<p>
Just wow.
</p>

<p>
Yo Bob. The Berlin wall was created to keep East Germans <em>in</em>. Trump's
wall is gonna keep illegal aliens <em>out</em>. But other than that, the two
walls are like totally the same.
</p>

<p>
Try reading a book Bob. You might learn something.
</p>

<p>
Hey New Jersey. You elected this bozo? Shame on you.
</p>

<p>
Oh BTW, 
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/menendez-expected-to-be-indicted-as-soon-as-wednesday-sources-say/2015/04/01/623024c6-d86e-11e4-8103-fa84725dbf9d_story.html">
he's under indictment</a>. It's gotta take a boatload of corruption for a
Democratic administration to indict a US Senator of their own party. Heck,
the case must be ironclad, or political hack Paul Fishman wouldn't have put
his John Hancock on it, because Fishman didn't touch Jon Corzine and you'd
have to be blinder than Stevie Wonder not to see <em>his</em> guilt.
</p>

<p>
Sorry Bob, but your credibility is shot. Anything you say can and will be used
against you in a court of law.
</p>

<p>
Completely unrelated, but fun to point out, 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/essex/index.ssf/2017/01/fbi_agents_raid_orange_city_hall_building_in_ongoi.html#incart_river_home_pop">
the Feds raided Orange city hall today in an ongoing fraud investigation</a>. 
Is Orange, NJ run by Democrats? Is there a mustache in Mexico? Yes to both!
But you already knew that.
</p>

<p>
Cory and Bob, your ineffective and unsuccessful attempts at character
assassination are noted, and rejected. Sit down. Shut up. Jeff Sessions 
and Rex Tillerson will both be confirmed. And then the Real Fun will begin!

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Donald-Trump" rel="tag">Donald-Trump</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Rex-Tillerson" rel="tag">Rex-Tillerson</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Jeff-Sessions" rel="tag">Jeff-Sessions</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Cory-Booker" rel="tag">Cory-Booker</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Bob-Menendez" rel="tag">Bob-Menendez</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/democrats</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 02:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">booker-menendez-tag-team-morons</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>See this penny? It&apos;s no ordinary cent, it&apos;s my Chris Christie Sales Tax Cut!</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/see-this-penny-its-my-sales-tax-cut.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Today is my lucky day! The daily $5 lunch special at Lakeside Deli cost me a
whole penny less, because 
<a href="http://nj1015.com/slight-drop-in-nj-sales-tax-takes-effect-january-will-you-notice/">
Chris Christie's sales tax cut</a> kicked in!
</p>

<p class="indent">
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/chris-christie-sales-tax-cut-penny.jpg" />
</p>

<p>
Yup, 'tis true. NJ's 7% sales tax is now, drum roll please!, <em>6.875%</em>.
</p>

<p>
A whopping 1/8 of a percent less!
</p>

<p>
Which means last week's $5.35 lunch bill is now $5.34.
</p>

<p>
Of course my euphoria is short-lived, because we only got this <em>massive</em>
sales tax cut in exchange for a 23 cent per gallon hike in the gas tax. And I've
already been paying that new tax for a few months now.
</p>

<p>
See how that works? Raise one tax by 23 cents. Cut another tax by 1/184th of
that much. Because, <em>fairness</em>, or something.
</p>

<p>
So I guess I should save this penny for posterity. Or until the next time I need
to buy gas, whichever comes first.
</p>

<p>
Thanks Governor!

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chris-Christie" rel="tag">Chris-Christie</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NJ-Politics" rel="tag">NJ-Politics</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/sales-tax" rel="tag">sales-tax</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/gas-tax" rel="tag">gas-tax</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 19:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">see-this-penny-its-my-sales-tax-cut</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Steve Sweeney&apos;s sneaky plan for hijacking the gas tax into bailing out NJ&apos;s public pensions</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/sweeney-plan-hijack-gas-tax-for-pensions.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Last month when you voted to dedicate the newly raised gas tax to the
Transportation Trust Fund I'll bet you thought that meant the gas tax
revenue would be going into the Transportation Trust Fund.
</p>

<p>
Suckers!
</p>

<p>
State Senate President Steve Sweeney wants to divert it to, drum roll please,
bailing out the public employee pension fund!
</p>

<p>
How? Easy! 
<a href="http://www.northjersey.com/story/news/new-jersey/2016/12/08/sweeney-touts-plan-allow-state-borrow-itself/95149602/">
Just have the pension fund buy the TTF bonds</a>. As in, New Jersey will 
borrow money from <em>itself</em> and then pay <em>itself</em> all the
interest.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Senate President Stephen Sweeney on Thursday announced a plan to allow the 
state's pension fund to buy bonds directly from the Transportation Trust Fund 
as it embarks on a borrowing spree to finance up to $16 billion worth of new 
infrastructure projects over the next eight years.
</p>
<p>
The proposed legislation would allow the pension fund to accrue annual interest 
on the state's debt rather than having the state pay that interest to Wall 
Street, Sweeney said. The state would also avoid paying bond underwriting fees.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Nice obfuscation there Steve. The interest doesn't go to "Wall Street." It
goes to mom and pop investors like me who buy government bonds. "Wall Street"
is just the middle man, because New Jersey doesn't have a system like Treasury
Direct that would allow individual investors to buy those bonds from the state,
and "avoid paying bond underwriting fees."
</p>

<p>
Why not?, you might ask. Because then guys like Jon Corzine and Phil Murphy 
wouldn't get their cut, except it turns out, when the vig goes to the public
employee unions instead. Then cutting off "Wall Street" is A-OK.
</p>

<p>
So there you have it. When they sold us on the gas tax they told us it was
for important stuff like roads and bridges. But when they spend the gas tax 
it'll be going to some guy sitting on a beach.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NJ-Politics" rel="tag">NJ-Politics</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/gas-tax" rel="tag">gas-tax</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/pensions" rel="tag">pensions</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/public-employee-unions" rel="tag">public-employee-unions</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Steve-Sweeney" rel="tag">Steve-Sweeney</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">sweeney-plan-hijack-gas-tax-for-pensions</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Jill Stein drops her PA recount bid, meaning her other 2 recounts are now pointless</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/jill-stein-drops-pa-recount.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Jill Stein's proxy war to propel Hillary Clinton into the White House is over.
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/03/green-party-drops-bid-for-statewide-pennsylvania-recount.html">
She's abandoning her Pennsylvania recount</a>, and with it any hope to reverse
Donald Trump's Electoral College advantage.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Green Party-backed voters dropped a court case Saturday night that had sought 
to force a statewide recount of Pennsylvania's Nov. 8 presidential election, 
won by Republican Donald Trump, in what Green Party presidential candidate Jill 
Stein had framed as an effort to explore whether voting machines and systems 
had been hacked and the election result manipulated.
</p>
<p>
The decision came two days before a court hearing was scheduled in the case. 
Saturday's court filing to withdraw the case said the Green Party-backed voters 
who filed the case "are regular citizens of ordinary means" and cannot afford 
the $1 million bond.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Looks like her fund-raising fell short.
</p>

<p>
And so, without an opportunity to revert Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes to
the Dowager Empress of Chappaqua, Stein's recount efforts in Wisconsin and
Michigan won't matter. Trump will officially win the presidency on December
19th.
</p>

<p>
So why is she soldiering on?
</p>

<p>
In a word, to deny Trump <em>legitimacy</em>.
</p>

<p>
With 306 electoral votes Donald Trump's victory is a veritable landslide.
</p>

<p>
But suppose that her recounts drag out, and Wisconsin and Michigan fail to
complete them by the December 13th deadline? Well then those states won't 
be able to <em>certify</em> their results, in which case their electors
will not be bound to Trump.
</p>

<p>
Suddenly 306 electoral votes become 280. And a ten vote margin is hardly
a mandate.
</p>

<p>
Still don't think Hillary's campaign is colluding with Stein on the recounts?
Because if you don't, George Soros has a bridge in Brooklyn he can let you 
have, cheap.
</p>

<p>
There's no way that a nobody candidate who barely raised $3 million dollars
in more than 2 years suddenly finds herself awash in more than twice that
much cash in 2 weeks. Not unless a whole lot of prominent Democrats are
writing her checks. And not unless she, overtly or not, promised them she'd
help Hillary steal the election.
</p>

<p>
But wait, there's more proof that Hillary's harridan hordes are playing dirty. 
PA is doxing electors, 
<a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2016/12/02/pennsylvania-gop-state-released-electors-personal-information/">
leading to incessant harassment</a>. Democrat Governor Tom Wolf, doing his 
best to one-up his convicted felon attorney general Kathleen Kane, released
the names, addresses, and phone numbers of Trump's PA electors.
</p>

<p>
He didn't do this because he's for open government.
</p>

<p>
He did it to promote thuggery.
</p>

<p>
Remember all the holier than thou preening when Donald Trump said he "might
not" accept the results of the election? Yeah, me neither. Because the preeners
are now engaged in an all-out assault on our nation's electoral integrity.
</p>

<p>
Fortunately their machinations will amount to nought. But it goes to show us
just how low they'll sink, how they'll leave no stone unturned in their quest
for power. And thus they remind us of why we must remain eternally vigilant.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Jill-Stein" rel="tag">Jill-Stein</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Green-Party" rel="tag">Green-Party</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/recount" rel="tag">recount</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Hillary-Clinton" rel="tag">Hillary-Clinton</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/election</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2016 02:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">jill-stein-drops-pa-recount</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Star-Ledger loves flag burners, but deletes questions about Koran burning</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/media/sleb-cant-admit-koran-burning-ok.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Today the uber-liberal Star-Ledger Editorial Board 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/11/trumps_suppression_of_free_speech_is_worse_than_bu.html#incart_river_home">
posted an opinion piece</a> chastising Donald Trump for wanting to imprison 
flag burners.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
In another pre-dawn Twitter purge, Donald Trump said our allegedly great 
democracy should throw flag-burners in jail or strip them of their citizenship.
</p>
<p>
One might dismiss this as visceral nonsense or just a shiny object for someone 
with the attention span of a compulsive 8-year-old, or maybe a distraction to 
keep his list of conflicts out of the news for few hours.
</p>
<p>
Actually, that tweet should be taken very seriously, not only because he needs 
to learn about the First and Fourteenth amendments, but because it captures how 
our next president feels about something as fundamental as freedom of expression.
</p>
</div>

<p>
OK, cool. It's their right. And they've got an endless supply of pixels.
</p>

<p>
Except, that "freedom of expression" thing doesn't apply to their comments
section.
</p>

<p>
Here's what I posted:
</p>

<p class="quoted">
How does the SLEB feel about Koran burning?
</p>

<p>
And Editor in Chief Tommy The Commie Moran deleted it faster than Hillary 
Clinton erased her email server.
</p>

<p>
Because liberals love flag burners. But they <em>hate</em> being called out
for their hypocrisy. And nothing emphasizes their hypocrisy more than burning
a Koran, which as we all know is a Hate Crime of epic proportions, and requires
denunciation of Islamophobia as a matter of principle.
</p>

<p>
Except their Islamophobia is another man's anti-Americanism. And you can't get 
more anti-American than burning Old Glory.
</p>

<p>
Alas we don't blow shit up when our flag gets torched.
</p>

<p>
Yet.
</p>

<p>
But wait, it's time for the pot to meet the kettle.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
These are all attempts to delegitimize - and even criminalize - political 
opinion he doesn't share.
</p>

<p>
Because it's not like the SLEB and their lefty friends have spent decades 
deligitimizing, and the past 8 years <em>criminalizing</em>, opinions they 
don't share.
</p>

<p>
Oh, wait, yes it is. They're the real fascists.
</p>

<p>
In New York City it is illegal, 
<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/nyc-bans-employers-from-calling-transgender-employees-wrong-gender/">
punishable by massive fines</a>, to refer to a "transgender" person by anything 
other than its <em>preferred</em> pronoun. You know, because government needs
to enshrine a constitutional right to mental illness.
</p>

<p>
Throughout the Old South monuments to Confederate heroes are being torn down
in the name of "tolerance." It's a Hate Crime to fly the Stars and Bars. But
I suppose burning one is A-OK, right SLEB?
</p>

<p>
Across the length and breadth of this great nation it is <em>illegal</em> to
refuse to bake a gay "wedding" cake.
</p>

<p>
And coincidentally today, the homofascist mafia has set their sights on
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/11/30/fixer-upper-stars-under-fire-for-attending-anti-gay-church.html">
Chip and Joanna Gaines</a>, for the unforgivable crime of attending a church
which condemns same-sex "marriage." A more wholesome couple you won't find,
anywhere. There could be no better role models for our children, or their
parents. They are the very embodiment of loving, caring, goodness.
</p>

<p>
But, <em>gack!</em>, they're "anti-gay!" 
</p>

<p>
Chip and Joanna (and in fact all Christians) are <em>the enemy</em>, they 
cannot be allowed to earn a living or star in a widely popular TV show. Their 
thoughtcrimes are repulsive. The death penalty must be the only option. 
</p>

<p>
That's the mentality the Star-Ledger defends whilst vilifying Donald Trump
and erasing comments which do not conform to their progressive worldview.
</p>

<p>
And they wonder why no one, including me, subscribes to their rag anymore.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/First-Amendment" rel="tag">First-Amendment</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/free-speech" rel="tag">free-speech</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/flag-burning" rel="tag">flag-burning</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/liberals" rel="tag">liberals</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/hypocrisy" rel="tag">hypocrisy</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/media</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">sleb-cant-admit-koran-burning-ok</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The exodus from New Jersey picks up steam, 227,000 taxpayers out, 62,000 immigrants in</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/get-out-while-the-getting-is-good.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Will the last person to leave New Jersey please turn out the lights?
</p>

<p>
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2016/11/227k_people_moved_out_of_nj_last_year_and_62k_immigrants_moved_in.html#incart_river_home_pop">
The population of the Garden State is shrinking</a>, as productive taxpayers 
move out, replaced by a smaller number of low-income immigrants.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
More than 200,000 residents left New Jersey last year, new Census data shows. 
</p>
<p>
The state lost 17,000 more people than it gained back, as residents left for 
other states and overseas, according to the 
<a href="https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2016/cb16-189.html">
2015 American Community Survey</a>. The loss could signal potential future 
issues with its population and economy.
</p>
<p>
New Jersey residents &mdash; 227,000 of them &mdash; abandoned the state 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2016/09/new_jersey_ranked_last_in_economic_growth_last_year_census_shows.html">
ranked dead last in income growth</a> last year, and with the highest property 
taxes.
</p>
<p>
Most of what the state gained back came from foreign immigration, which netted 
the state 62,000 new residents last year. Earlier data suggests that many of 
those immigrants come from Asia, as the region accounted for 45 percent of new 
foreign migrants in 2014. 
</p>
</div>

<p>
Most of our refugees ended up in Pennsylvania, Florida, California, North
Carolina, and Texas. Which says to me, if you're leaving NJ for Kookyfornia,
well, things here must be pretty bad. Those nuts just banned plastic grocery
bags, and they don't have any water. Yet almost 13,000 people thought it was
a better place to live than our not so fair state.
</p>

<p>
But those other states, they have vibrant economies. Us? We've got Chris
Christie back, seeing as how his audition for Donald Trump's cabinet didn't
go exactly as planned. Color me underwhelmed. He doesn't want to be here,
and frankly, we don't want him to be here either.
</p>

<p>
Except, the only thing worse than a Governor Chris Christie is limousine 
liberal Phil Murphy, or God forbid John Wisniewski. Yet they're the 
front-runners to succeed Governor Gas Tax, who is inexplicably doing 
everything he can to torpedo the candidacy of Lt. Governor Kim Guadagno.
</p>

<p>
Once upon a time our state slogan was "New Jersey and You, Perfect
Together." Now it's "Get Out While The Getting Is Good."

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NJ-Politics" rel="tag">NJ-Politics</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/immigration" rel="tag">immigration</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/migration" rel="tag">migration</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 01:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">get-out-while-the-getting-is-good</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Chris Christie (remember him?) vetoes unemployment benefits for striking workers</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/christie-vetoes-unemployment-pmts-to-strikers.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Taking some time off from his rapidly diminishing role on Donald Trump's 
presidential transition team, NJ Governor Chris Christie returned to Trenton 
today to whack some common sense into our state's legislative Democrats. 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/11/christie_vetoes_unemployment_insurance_for_strikin.html#incart_river_home">
He vetoed a bill</a> that would have granted unemployment insurance benefits to
striking Verizon and casino workers.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Gov. Chris Christie on Monday nixed a bill that would have allowed striking 
workers to 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/08/senate_approves_unemployment_insurance_for_strikin.html">
collect unemployment benefits</a>.
</p>
<p>
The bill 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/05/striking_verizon_workers_could_receive_nj_unemploy.html">
emerged</a> during a six-week strike involving Verizon workers who walked off 
the job in protest of the telecommunications giant's contract demands. About 
4,600 of the 40,000 East Coast employees on strike work in New Jersey. They 
returned to work in June.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Good. The Democrats think we're stupid and we'll gladly pay their unionista
buddies to go on strike. Except that's what their precious union's strike 
fund is for. And in the Real World, if you can't afford to go on strike, 
<em>don't go on strike</em>. 
</p>

<p>
Alas our reprieve might be short-lived. The Democrats have cleared the decks
for limousine liberal Phil Murphy (aka Jon Corzine 2.0) to run for governor
next year. And since the NJ GOP bench is, shall we say, <em>weak</em> thanks
to Chris Christie's "troubles," it's likely he'll win, handing the reins of
NJ government over to the Tax-And-Spend crowd. 
</p>

<p>
But a lot can happen in a year. And a win's a win. So thanks governor. We're
glad you remembered where your office was. Don't be a stranger, OK?

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chris-Christie" rel="tag">Chris-Christie</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NJ-Politics" rel="tag">NJ-Politics</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/unions" rel="tag">unions</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/unemployment-benefits" rel="tag">unemployment-benefits</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">christie-vetoes-unemployment-pmts-to-strikers</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Media hacks in the tank for Obama and Clinton whine that Trump won&apos;t bow before them</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/media/hacks-complain-trump-wont-bow-before-them.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/11/trump-team-we-fully-expect-white-house-press-pool-231199">
The White House Correspondents Association has it's collective panties in a
knot</a> because President-elect Trump doesn't consult them, ever.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"The White House Correspondents' Association is deeply concerned by 
President-elect Donald Trump's decision to reject the practice of traveling 
with a "protective pool" of reporters for his first visit to Washington since 
the election," White House Correspondents Association President Jeff Mason said 
in a statement. "In addition to breaking with decades of historical precedent 
and First Amendment principles, this decision could leave Americans blind about 
his whereabouts and well-being in the event of a national crisis. A pool of 
reporters is in place and ready to cover President-elect Trump. The WHCA urges 
President-elect Trump to allow it to do its job, including being present for 
motorcade movements, meetings, and other interactions. Not allowing a pool of 
journalists to travel with and cover the next president of the United States 
is unacceptable."
</p>

<p>
Listen up you sanctimonious stenographer for the DNC, President-elect Trump
knows where your loyalties lie, because they most certainly do not lie with 
"First Amendment principles." You hacks have no <em>principles</em>. You 
exposed yourselves as whoring cheerleaders for progressive Democrats and 
now you demand that the object of your derision bow before your preening 
self-importance?
</p>

<p>
Let's get something straight sport. You need Trump. Trump doesn't need you.
</p>

<p>
There's plenty of alternative media. And a good portion of that media isn't 
permeated by left-wing bias. Which is how Trump became President-elect in
spite of your best efforts to coronate Hillary Clinton.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
White House press secretary Josh Earnest said on Thursday that he would tell 
the Trump transition team that it has "a responsibility to communicate with 
the White House press corps."
</p>

<p>
Got a Constitutional citation for that "responsibility" Josh?
</p>

<p>
Didn't think so.
</p>

<p>
I have a feeling that President Trump will find a way to get his message out
just fine, without filtering it through the 
<a href="http://legalinsurrection.com/2014/08/journolist-2-0/">
JournoList</a> clown show. 
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"Having a pool of reporters follow you around everywhere you go is inconvenient,
occasionally annoying and takes a long time to get used to, but it serves an 
important purpose," Earnest said during the daily briefing. "And this White 
House has gone to great lengths to coordinate with all of you as you organize 
that effort and I would recommend that the incoming administration do the same."
</p>

<p>
The operative word there being "coordinate." We know all about the MSM / DNC
<em>coordination</em> that's been going on. So tell me Mr. Journalist, will
<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/17/politico-reporter-sends-story-to-hillary-aide-for-approval-admits-hes-a-hack/">
Glenn Thrush</a> send his stories to President Trump for pre-approval? Will
<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/31/donna-brazile-shared-additional-debate-questions-with-clinton-campaign-identified-her-tipster/">
CNN secretly share</a> their interview questions with him in advance? Will 
<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/article/226104/la-times-suppresses-obamas-khalidi-bash-tape-andrew-c-mccarthy">
the LA Times bury</a> an unflattering tape of his remarks?
</p>

<p>
I suspect not.
</p>

<p>
Because in the end 
<a href="http://nypost.com/2016/11/07/the-media-is-the-biggest-loser-of-this-campaign/">
your credibility is shot</a>, beyond repair. Your elitist disdain for Trump and
his voters cannot be denied. Like I said, <em>he doesn't need you</em>. And 
there really is no good reason he should even throw you a bone. I hope he
banishes each and every one of you pressitutes to the wilderness where you
can flounder in a pool of lost subscribers and diminishing revenue. 
</p>

<p>
The MSM is dead, of a self-inflicted wound.
</p>

<p>
Good riddance.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Donald-Trump" rel="tag">Donald-Trump</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/media-bias" rel="tag">media-bias</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/White-House" rel="tag">White-House</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/WHCA" rel="tag">WHCA</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/media</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 16:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">hacks-complain-trump-wont-bow-before-them</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Congratulations President-Elect Trump!</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/congratulations-president-elect-trump.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Yup, we stayed up until 3:30 AM to watch the victory speech. Sophie zonked
out at around 1, but I woke up at 2:30 to tell her the good news.
</p>

<p>
God bless her, she made it to the school bus on time this morning!
</p>

<p>
Anyway, it's a good day to be an American. And since I'm basically running
on coffee I'll just post some celebratory music to congratulate President-Elect
Donald J. Trump.
</p>

<p class="indent">
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6AB2Y-ZsEak?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</p>

<p class="indent">
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rEJo7x9y3D4?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</p>

<p>
We're gonna Make America Great Again!

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Donald-Trump" rel="tag">Donald-Trump</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/election</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 20:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">congratulations-president-elect-trump</guid>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
