WyBlog, the best thing about New Jersey since the invention of the 24 hour diner.
Chris Wysocki
Caldwell, NJ
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." - Ronald Reagan
Linkiest
CH 2.0 Info Center
The Jersey Report
Labor Union Report
Memeorandum
Net Right Nation
The Patriot Post Newsletter
Pajamas Media
PJTV
Victor Davis Hanson
J! E! T! S! Jets! Jets! Jets!
OpenVMS.org Portal
AVS Forum
NJ.com Caldwell Forum
The Caldwells Patch
The Jersey Tomato Press
"This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, social issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes."
The Constitution says Barack Obama can nominate someone to replace Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court.
The Constitution also says the Senate provides advice and consent.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said members of the panel reached a "consensus" that there should not be hearings or a vote on President Obama's nominee.
"My decision is that I don't think we should have a hearing. We should let the next president pick the Supreme Court justice," he said after emerging from a meeting in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) office.
All 11 members of the panel signed a letter to McConnell Tuesday declaring they would not hold hearings to ensure the next president, not Obama, pick someone to replace the late conservative justice, Antonin Scalia.
"We wish to inform you of our intention to exercise our constitutional authority to withhold consent on any nominee to the Supreme Court submitted by this president to fill Justice Scalia's vacancy," they wrote.
And why shouldn't they stand firm? After all, it was originally Joe Biden's idea.
If you're keeping score, this means that the current president, current vice president, current Senate minority leader, and incoming Senate minority leader have all gone on record in the past in favor of obstructing a Supreme Court nominee.
Inconvenient, that. But funny!
Of course the only fly in the ointment is who gets elected as our 45th president. As of now there are 5 people with a reasonable shot at the title, and I gotta tell ya, at least 3 (probably 4) of those 5 aren't exactly predisposed to nominating someone with Scalia's intellect, principles, or disposition.
This election is for all the marbles kids. Don't screw it up.
Posted at 16:38 by Chris Wysocki
[/gop]
Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags:
Senate
GOP
Republican
Lindsay-Graham
Mitch-McConnell
Obama
SCOTUS
|
Tweet
Previous: Today's Star-Ledger editorial: Peach pits are more deadly than Islamic terrorism | Next: Too little too late: Rick Perry vindicated by Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Main |