In the national security debate the GOP has 7 sane candidates and Ron Paul

I know I'm gonna take some heat, but good God man, what was Ron Paul thinking?

The Taliban only wants to fight us "over there?" Well sure dude, if you don't count those 4 hijacked airplanes and two demolished buildings. Other than that there's, oh I don't know, only a coupla dozen Islamic nutjobs who've brought jihad to within pissing distance of my front porch. That's "over there," if you're Ron Paul.

To the sane though, it's out there, which is where he belongs. Compared to Ron Paul even Jon Huntsman looks credible.

And were my ears deceiving me or did Mitt Romney sound positively hawkish tonight? What's up with that? Is it an act?

Probably.

When Newt came out for Amnesty Mitt didn't say "boo." Jump on Rick Perry, Mitt did, for the same stance, but Newtie gets a pass?

I actually thought that Perry had the best response to the illegal alien issue. Secure the border, then decide who stays and who goes. An unsecure border is an incentive, and it sends the wrong message.

To Herman Cain I say with all honesty, the answer to every question is not "weigh the options." Take a stand Herm; any stand, and defend it. We've already got a Weathervane in Chief, and look how well that's worked out.

I honestly can't remember anything that Santorum or Bachmann said. Which seems like par for the course. They're excess baggage, and it's time they hit the lecture circuit. Do us a favor and bring Huntsman with you. Thanks.

Posted at 22:49 by Chris Wysocki   [/election]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: Ron-Paul GOP Republican 2012 debate Mitt-Romney   |   Tweet