WyBlog, the best thing about New Jersey since the invention of the 24 hour diner.
Chris Wysocki
Caldwell, NJ
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." - Ronald Reagan
Linkiest
CH 2.0 Info Center
The Jersey Report
Labor Union Report
Memeorandum
Net Right Nation
The Patriot Post Newsletter
Pajamas Media
PJTV
Victor Davis Hanson
J! E! T! S! Jets! Jets! Jets!
OpenVMS.org Portal
AVS Forum
NJ.com Caldwell Forum
The Caldwells Patch
The Jersey Tomato Press
"This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, social issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes."
Looks like it's deviancy in education week here at the WyBlog. Everywhere I turn the mainstreaming of homosexuality is being presented to our children as the essence of normalcy. Even worse, explicit sexual imagery now permeates elementary school curricula nationwide.
Let's start today with a peek behind the curtain as an entire school prepares for Gay Pride Day. Yes, kindergarten isn't too young for indoctrination into the cult of the San Francisco Handshake:
But, you'll say, the school is just emphasizing tolerance. Sure they are. They could do that well enough though without having to explain buggery to 5 year olds. Did you catch the wide-eyed look on some of the younger children? And given the manner in which the subject was presented how could every kid not want two mommies! They made it seem like a family with only one mom was somehow abnormal. And of course after watching hop-along-soccer-dude's act I can only imagine that no boy would dream of running onto the field unless his two dads were card-carrying members of Poofters R Us.
Is this really what we want to be teaching our impressionable children?
The National Education Association says "yes".
"Oral sex, masturbation, and orgasms need to be taught in education," Diane Schneider told the audience at a [United Nations conference] panel on combating homophobia and transphobia. Schneider, representing the National Education Association (NEA), the largest teachers union in the US, advocated for more "inclusive" sex education in US schools. . . . She claimed that the idea of sex education remains an oxymoron if it is abstinence-based, or if students are still able to opt-out. Comprehensive sex education is "the only way to combat heterosexism and gender conformity," Schneider proclaimed, "and we must make these issues a part of every middle and high-school student's agenda.. . . . A panel sponsored in part by the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) advocated for "comprehensive sex education" not only as a tool to combat "gender oppression," but also as the key to achieving all of the Millennium Development Goals.
Sheesh. It's like I'm a voice in the wilderness, crying out against the mainstreaming of deviancy. Is it really the job of our public schools to "combat heterosexism and gender conformity" instead of teaching reading, writing, and arithmetic? Today's lesson — boys will be girls!
Stacy McCain took a look into Diane Schneider's ideal school environment. Guess what? According to her, every day is cross-dressing day:
Typically during "Mix 'n' Match Day," at Ramapo High School in Spring Valley, N.Y., students might wear polka dots with stripes, said Diane Schneider, a teacher who is a chairwoman of the Hudson Valley chapter of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. But this year, she said, "about 50 kids came as cross-dressers."
Ah yes, GLSEN rears it's perverted head again. With them on the job it's only a matter of time before Northwestern University's approach to Sex Ed is de rigeur for the pre-school set.
If you're thinking "that can't happen," think again. In suburban Chicago a film depicting nudity, child rape, and suicide was shown to 9 year olds, with the blessing of the school board and administration.
The issue came to light after Patrick Livney and three other parents of Greeley School fourth graders complained about the film.
Livney said it's had scarring effects on his daughter and other students at Greeley.
"Now we've got a situation where there's demonstrable damage done to 9-year-olds' brains. We have fourth graders talking about depressing classrooms, depression. Boys going around talking about 'rape dogs.' Are you kidding me?" Livney said. "After five great years at Greeley, (my daughter) doesn't want to go to school."
He said some boys now don't want to go into the water "because this movie shows sharks devouring slaves who were purposely thrown overboard."[snip]
The film was about slavery, with graphic depictions of the horrors inflicted on the victims of the slave trade. So naturally any parent who suggested that it might have been more appropriate for older children is automatically a racist.
About 20 million Africans were taken from homes and families and sold into slavery to work plantations in North and South America. More than half died. But the real tragedy, really and seriously, is that a privileged little girl from Winnetka had to see some scary pictures of it. That's serious, long-lasting damage.
For the record, I wouldn't want my third grade daughter watching a graphic film about Auschwitz either. Does that make me anti-Semitic as well as racist?
Why aren't parents permitted to define the parameters of their own child's "safe learning environment"? Anne Leary at Backyard Conservative asks:
Who is politicizing education? For the children. Who is treating children as pawns for their agenda? Is this a "safe learning environment"? Causing some children to cry until midnight and have recurring nightmares and fears?
I think we know the answer to that one. The radicals who control our schools. They're taking children in their formative years and deliberately traumatizing them in service to a socio-political agenda. The goal is to desensitize our children to morally repugnant behavior. And it's working.
"They don't follow the same curriculum standards" is one of the loudest
objections voiced against giving vouchers to children attending Catholic
schools. To which I say, if these are the curriculum standards they're
talking about, thank God for Catholic education. It truly is a light
in the darkness.
Posted at 11:53 by Chris Wysocki
[/education]
Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags:
education
children
homosexual
|
Tweet
Previous: Go To Jail, Go Directly To Jail, but sure, you can still Pass Go and Collect $200 | Next: Planned Parenthood redefines "Be Prepared" for the Girl Scouts |
Main |