The radical homosexual indoctrination of our children ramps up, now with U.N. approval

Looks like it's deviancy in education week here at the WyBlog. Everywhere I turn the mainstreaming of homosexuality is being presented to our children as the essence of normalcy. Even worse, explicit sexual imagery now permeates elementary school curricula nationwide.

Let's start today with a peek behind the curtain as an entire school prepares for Gay Pride Day. Yes, kindergarten isn't too young for indoctrination into the cult of the San Francisco Handshake:

But, you'll say, the school is just emphasizing tolerance. Sure they are. They could do that well enough though without having to explain buggery to 5 year olds. Did you catch the wide-eyed look on some of the younger children? And given the manner in which the subject was presented how could every kid not want two mommies! They made it seem like a family with only one mom was somehow abnormal. And of course after watching hop-along-soccer-dude's act I can only imagine that no boy would dream of running onto the field unless his two dads were card-carrying members of Poofters R Us.

Is this really what we want to be teaching our impressionable children?

The National Education Association says "yes".

"Oral sex, masturbation, and orgasms need to be taught in education," Diane Schneider told the audience at a [United Nations conference] panel on combating homophobia and transphobia. Schneider, representing the National Education Association (NEA), the largest teachers union in the US, advocated for more "inclusive" sex education in US schools. . . . She claimed that the idea of sex education remains an oxymoron if it is abstinence-based, or if students are still able to opt-out. Comprehensive sex education is "the only way to combat heterosexism and gender conformity," Schneider proclaimed, "and we must make these issues a part of every middle and high-school student's agenda.. . . . A panel sponsored in part by the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) advocated for "comprehensive sex education" not only as a tool to combat "gender oppression," but also as the key to achieving all of the Millennium Development Goals.

Sheesh. It's like I'm a voice in the wilderness, crying out against the mainstreaming of deviancy. Is it really the job of our public schools to "combat heterosexism and gender conformity" instead of teaching reading, writing, and arithmetic? Today's lesson — boys will be girls!

Stacy McCain took a look into Diane Schneider's ideal school environment. Guess what? According to her, every day is cross-dressing day:

Typically during "Mix 'n' Match Day," at Ramapo High School in Spring Valley, N.Y., students might wear polka dots with stripes, said Diane Schneider, a teacher who is a chairwoman of the Hudson Valley chapter of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. But this year, she said, "about 50 kids came as cross-dressers."

Ah yes, GLSEN rears it's perverted head again. With them on the job it's only a matter of time before Northwestern University's approach to Sex Ed is de rigeur for the pre-school set.

If you're thinking "that can't happen," think again. In suburban Chicago a film depicting nudity, child rape, and suicide was shown to 9 year olds, with the blessing of the school board and administration.

The film was about slavery, with graphic depictions of the horrors inflicted on the victims of the slave trade. So naturally any parent who suggested that it might have been more appropriate for older children is automatically a racist.

About 20 million Africans were taken from homes and families and sold into slavery to work plantations in North and South America. More than half died. But the real tragedy, really and seriously, is that a privileged little girl from Winnetka had to see some scary pictures of it. That's serious, long-lasting damage.

For the record, I wouldn't want my third grade daughter watching a graphic film about Auschwitz either. Does that make me anti-Semitic as well as racist?

Why aren't parents permitted to define the parameters of their own child's "safe learning environment"? Anne Leary at Backyard Conservative asks:

Who is politicizing education? For the children. Who is treating children as pawns for their agenda? Is this a "safe learning environment"? Causing some children to cry until midnight and have recurring nightmares and fears?

I think we know the answer to that one. The radicals who control our schools. They're taking children in their formative years and deliberately traumatizing them in service to a socio-political agenda. The goal is to desensitize our children to morally repugnant behavior. And it's working.

"They don't follow the same curriculum standards" is one of the loudest objections voiced against giving vouchers to children attending Catholic schools. To which I say, if these are the curriculum standards they're talking about, thank God for Catholic education. It truly is a light in the darkness.

Posted at 11:53 by Chris Wysocki   [/education]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: education children homosexual   |   Tweet