WyBlog, the best thing about New Jersey since the invention of the 24 hour diner.
Chris Wysocki
Caldwell, NJ
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." - Ronald Reagan
Linkiest
CH 2.0 Info Center
The Jersey Report
Labor Union Report
Memeorandum
Net Right Nation
The Patriot Post Newsletter
Pajamas Media
PJTV
Victor Davis Hanson
J! E! T! S! Jets! Jets! Jets!
OpenVMS.org Portal
AVS Forum
NJ.com Caldwell Forum
The Caldwells Patch
The Jersey Tomato Press
"This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, social issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes."
They cost 10 times as much as a regular incandescent light bulb.
They're supposed to last 10 times as long, and save energy in the process.
But now that the results are in, it turns out the hype over Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs was wrong, and wrong, and wrong again.
They don't last:
One hitch was the compact-fluorescent burnout rate. When PG&E began its 2006-2008 program, it figured the useful life of each bulb would be 9.4 years. Now, with experience, it has cut the estimate to 6.3 years, which limits the energy savings. Field tests show higher burnout rates in certain locations, such as bathrooms and in recessed lighting. Turning them on and off a lot also appears to impair longevity.
And, the energy-saving claims were specious:
Energy savings attributed to PG&E were pegged at 451.6 million kilowatt hours by regulators, or 73% less than the 1.7 billion kilowatt hours projected by PG&E for the 2006-2008 program.
But other than that, they're a great value!
Um, not really.
From personal experience I can say the DOA rate is completely unacceptable too. About 1/3 of the CFL bulbs I've bought were dead out of the box. That's probably because all the energy saving and relability studies were done using American made bulbs, not the cheap Chinese junk which populates the shelves in Home Depot and Ace Hardware.
Can you remember the last time a regular incandescent bulb was dead out of the box? Me neither.
Not to mention that the quality of the light is awful. That "CFL glow" is unnatural, unappealing, and unacceptably harsh. If you like the industrial look, great. Most of us don't.
The whole CFL scam reminds me of an old National Lampoon (or was it SNL?) skit, "You get less than half the value at more than twice the price!"
But, leave it to German ingenuity to find a way around the 100 Watt incandescent bulb ban — heat balls!
You gotta hand it to German businessman Siegfried Rotthaeuser, who came up with a brilliant run around the European Union ban on conventional incandescent light bulbs — he rebranded them as "Heat Balls" and is importing them for sale as a "small heating device."
Heh.
Posted at 12:36 by Chris Wysocki
[/agw]
Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags:
AGW
CFL
fluorescent
light-bulb
energy
|
Tweet
Previous: Hu's on first | Next: How about a Christie - Ryan ticket? |
Main |