State Dept IG smokescreen: Hillary violated email rules, but so did everyone else

It's not exactly a smoking gun. And it's certainly not a stinging rebuke. But at least it's not a total whitewash either. The State Department's Inspector General has finally issued a report on Hillary Clinton's private email server, and yes, it says she broke the rules.

So far so good, right?

Here comes the "but."

And there you have it. The "everybody else was doing it" defense.

It's a smokescreen big enough to hide all of her transgressions.

You watch. The FBI will say they can't recommend indicting Hillary because they didn't indict Colin Powell way-back-when.

And then all the way to November, no matter what Trump says about Crooked Hillary, her media sycophants will keep spinning the lack of an indictment as "proving" she was "cleared."

I told you guys the fix was in.

Damn, I hate being right all the time.

Posted at 12:07 by Chris Wysocki   [/election]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: email Hillary-Clinton State-Dept   |   Tweet

When Obama sent $500 million to that UN climate slush fund, he robbed it from Zika prevention

Remember back in March when I noted that Obama bypassed Congress to send $500 million to a UN climate slush fund?

Congress didn't appropriate any money for his green dreams, so he took the $500 million from "somewhere else."

Well, Thanks to Senator James Lankford (R-OK) now we know where that money was supposed to go. Zika prevention.

Sorry pregnant women, Mother Gaia takes priority over you.

While I understand that intelligent people can disagree on the human effects on the global climate, it is hard to imagine a reason why the administration would prioritize the U.N. Green Climate Fund over protecting the American people, especially pregnant women, from the Zika virus.

Oh c'mon Senator, of course you can imagine why this president would prioritize climate change over human suffering. It's his legacy. It's how he collects accolades from preening liberals like Leonardo DiCaprio. And face it, what Leo thinks is far more important to Mr. Obama than the suffering of some nameless, faceless children.

It's called Virtue Signaling.

Combating Climate Change gets him invited to all the best parties and fawning coverage from the New York Times. Fighting Zika is harder, prone to possible failure, and not something limousine liberals care about because if it affects them at all, it's only because the maid or the gardener is prattling on about it instead of doing what they're paid to do.

Climate Change is the cause du jour.

Zika is somebody else's problem.

Fortunately Senator there is another arrow in your quiver. Introduce legislation to bring back DDT. If nothing else, hilarity will ensue.

Posted at 09:43 by Chris Wysocki   [/obama_watch]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: Obama AGW UN Climate-Change Zika   |   Tweet

While you weren't looking, the number of Obamacare insurers in NJ dropped to 4

Choices? You now have fewer.

There goes my plan.

I liked it. But, I can't keep it.

Of course I liked my pre-Obamacare plan better, but I couldn't keep that either.

Thanks Barry!

Oxford customers affected by this move are to receive notification letters in late June. They will be able to shop for replacement coverage during the open enrollment period that begins on Nov. 1.

Yippee Kai Ay.

The insurers currently approved to sell coverage through the Affordable Care Act in New Jersey are Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, AmeriHealth of New Jersey, Health Republic of New Jersey, and Oscar Health Insurance, which is available in nine counties, including Bergen and Passaic.

With competition decreasing, watch for rate hikes. Big rate hikes. Because anyone who thought "affordable care" meant lower prices is an idiot. Or a Democrat. But I repeat myself.

Donald Trump says he'll shut Obamacare down.

I think I'm ready to vote for that.

Posted at 21:00 by Chris Wysocki   [/obamacare]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: Obamacare New-Jersey health-insurance United-Healthcare   |   Tweet

NJ Democrats propose paying unemployment benefits to striking Verizon unionistas

Verizon's unionized workers voluntarily walked off the job, to demand higher pay and more lavish benefits. Now they're earning zero, and crying poverty. So naturally New Jersey Democrats want to bail them out with our tax dollars.

I wanna shake the hand of the person who voted "no."

"This legislation we obviously think is important for the thousands of workers who have really almost (been) forced to be off the job, walked off their job, because of the contract dispute and the way in which Verizon has negotiated this contract and what Verizon has asked their employees to do in order to maintain their employment," state Sen. Joe Vitale (D-Middlesex), who sponsored the bill along with state Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-Gloucester).

Um, OK. Except Verizon didn't lock them out. They could be working right now, earning a paycheck, which as it happens, is already bigger than current telecom industry norms.

The unionistas voluntarily walked off the job.

Actions have consequences. And one consequence of walking off the job is that you no longer get paid.

Nicholas Sheola, a chief steward for CWA Local 1000, said that while CWA has a strike relief fund that pays out about $300 a week, IBEW members don't have the same benefit. To get by, he said, they're borrowing money from family and friends or "they're robbing Peter to pay Paul."

The IBEW doesn't have a strike fund?

Don't their members pay union dues? Where does that money go?

Oh, right, it goes toward campaign contributions to Democrats.

Which, of course, is why the Democrats are so eager to pander to them with our money.

"We don't know when we're going back to work. It's a big hit," he said. "A lot of us have families. We don't have medical anymore, so we may have to pay for Cobra or something like that. So another source of income would be good to have."

Yo, Chief, I know when you can go back to work.

Today.

Show up. Do your job. And amazingly Verizon will pay you!

But that's harder than taking a taxpayer-funded vacation, so it's obviously a non-starter with you wannabe socialists.

Fortunately Governor Chris Christie is almost certain to veto this insanity. So it's merely grandstanding by bought-and-paid-for Democrats for their gullible unionista donors. Vote Democrat, it's easier than showing up for your job!

Posted at 10:11 by Chris Wysocki   [/nj_politics]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: unions Verizon IBEW CWA unemployment   |   Tweet

Hope and Sex Change Part 2: Obamacare must now cover gender reassignment therapy

That man in the girls' locker room? You're gonna pay to put him there.

Right behind his coed bathroom mandate, General Secretary Obama also decreed that health insurance companies participating in Obamacare must now cover sex change operations.

Marvelous.

Let's tack on another expensive mandate! Because our premiums aren't high enough already, right?

Meanwhile, the folks who pioneered sex change surgery no longer offer that form of treatment. Here's why:

Speaking of Bruce Jenner, word is that he's going to "de-transition." So had this regulation been in place when he invented "Caitlyn," Obama would have us paying for both sex changes.

At least he's an adult, and if he wants to screw around with his plumbing and his hormones, well that's why we have tabloids and celebrity gossip columnists.

But when kids decide to reconfigure their biology, it's a whole lot more consequential.

According to Obama, a school that can't legally give a child an aspirin, can, and indeed must, honor that child's "perceived gender" with nary a question or raised eyebrow. And doctors who would cringe at seeing a teenage girl enter a tanning booth or smoke a cigarette won't hesitate to give her life-altering drugs that radically revise her transition into puberty.

Because, feelings.

It's madness.

Not only that, but according to Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist in chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital, it's "impossible" too.

He went on to write that changing sexes is impossible and that what transgendered people actually do is become "feminized men or masculinized women."

Hmm. Now we're on to something. "Feminized men" and "masculinized women." That's the goal of Third-Wave Feminism, isn't it? Erasure of gender norms, leading to a society ruled by militant lesbians, with heterosexual men marginalized or eradicated altogether.

It's just one more way for cultural Marxists to fundamentally transform America.

Posted at 14:41 by Chris Wysocki   [/obamacare]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: Obamacare LGBT transgender mandate   |   Tweet

Dictator Obama decrees all public school bathrooms and locker rooms must be coed

He's got a pen and a phone, and he's fundamentally transforming every corner of America. Your child's school is now in the crosshairs of his social justice warriors, and with it any expectations of privacy and decency.

Boys will shower with girls.

(Cue Yul Brynner voice… So let it be written. So let it be done!)

The Obama administration is sending out an edict today to every school district in the country, insisting they open bathrooms, locker rooms, and showers to all children, regardless of sex, or risk federal discrimination lawsuits and yanked federal funds. Schools must treat children as transgender and thus entitled to open facilities access as soon as parents say they are, not after a medical diagnosis or birth certificate change. Schools may, however, give all the other kids with healthy gender identities curtains to hide behind or license to use toilet stalls to change.

Because in topsy-turvy SJW world, no one should feel "unwelcome," except, you know, all the normal kids.

"No student should ever have to go through the experience of feeling unwelcome at school or on a college campus," [Education Secretary John B.] King said. "We must ensure that our young people know that whoever they are or wherever they come from, they have the opportunity to get a great education in an environment free from discrimination, harassment and violence."

The only "harassment" here is coming from the LGBT bullies. They've already shoved a redefinition of marriage down our throats, and this is the next front in their all-out war on morality, decency, and common sense. To accommodate their radical agenda the vast majority of us must be inconvenienced, and of course irritated into mindless acceptance of their distorted worldview.

So if every girl in your school now feels "unwelcome" in the locker room when there's a boy showering with her, that's not a Real Problem. Because, "tolerance!" And the onus is on parents to seek "additional privacy" for our daughters, instead of quite reasonably creating a gender-neutral facility for the allegedly transgender child.

Some parents are already fighting back.

But that's not "bullying," right SJWs? Because to them it's "education." It's "awareness." It's "empowerment."

Which of course is nonsense on stilts.

Our daughters have Rights. And their rights are just as inviolate as the newly-minted rights of the confused teenage boy pretending to be a girl.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced he will stand up for our daughters' rights by filing a lawsuit against the Department of Education over the mandate.

God bless Texas. And North Carolina.

I can't wait to see Hillary Clinton try to defend this policy on the campaign trail. It's gonna make her awkward encounter with a West Virginia coal miner look like a walk in the park in comparison.

Republicans could have a field day with this in the general election. Except we've managed to put forth a candidate who agrees with the bathroom bullies.

Oops.

And down the rabbit hole we go.

Posted at 10:01 by Chris Wysocki   [/education]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: Obama transgender gender bathroom locker-room education Title-IX   |   Tweet

Presidency For Sale: Persian Gulf Sheikhs gave Bill and Hillary Clinton $100 million dollars

Remember when President Bill Clinton rented out the Lincoln Bedroom?

That was just the warm-up act.

He and She Who Would Be Empress have collected at least $100 million dollars from Arab sheikhs and their autocratic and anti-Semetic regimes.

Those governments are some of the most horrific abusers of human rights in the world.

For years, the accusations have centered on the Persian Gulf practice of importing hundreds of thousands of poor foreign laborers who work for low wages, including hundreds of thousands of female "domestic workers" who have no labor rights and often face exploitation and sexual abuse.

I wonder how all the Clinton supporters wailing about North Carolina's "bathroom law" feel about that? Oh, right, it's a non-story, because Hillary has a vagina.

And money in politics is only bad when it comes from the Koch Brothers. Pure-as-the-driven-snow Hillary would never let a donor influence her stance on an important issue. Honest!

Imagine that. Purely coincidental!

So, to ask this question, is to answer it.

How would the American people ever know with any certainty that a decision by President Hillary Clinton was made to advance the best interests of the U.S. or to make the Clintons even richer?

Hillary's presidency is For Sale.

Eva Peron, eat your heart out.

Posted at 11:53 by Chris Wysocki   [/election]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: Hillary-Clinton Clinton-Foundation corruption Middle-East   |   Tweet

NYC Democrats: We're from the government and we're here to irritate you

New York City councilman Brad Lander (D-Brooklyn) is largely responsible for the plastic bag fee about to hit the Big Apple. And why is he so gung-ho about it? Because he wants the government to "irritate" you.

This is the Progressive Democrats' raison d'etra, to irritate you.

And of course to signal how virtuous they are.

Do they care if their irritants cause real hardships for real people?

Don't make me laugh.

Hey, they bankrupted an entire industry (coal), putting millions of people out of work, devolving vast swaths of West Virginia, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and Ohio into soul-crushing poverty. Do you really think they care about some old lady in Queens living on Social Security? Her electricity rates have already "necessarily skyrocketed." What's another 50 cents?

Think of how many Democratic party policies have at their core the propensity to irritate us. Which they always manage to say is for our own good, of course.

It's dictatorship of the nanny state.

Progressives always know what's good for us better than we do. Just ask them. It's necessary for them to control us, because then we're busy complying with their mandates and we don't have time to get our own ideas. Once in a while they throw us a bone and we lap it up like good little automatons, because making choices is hard and making good choices is harder still.

Several years ago I actually had a person tell me in response to some new bureaucratic diktat or another, "why should I worry about that when the government has already decided the best way to handle it?"

Then in the next breath she complained about the Iraq war, but the disconnect in those two statements was completely lost on her. The government is only omnipotent when it's doing things Progressives believe in, I guess.

Oh, by the way, those reusable cloth bags come with their own problems. So get ready for an "unexpected" jump in e. coli infections, disproportionally affecting the elderly and the poor, that all the progressive media outlets will dutifully report on but dare not connect with Councilman Lander's plastic bag ban.

And then the progressive virtue signalers will mandate cloth bag testing stations, manned by unionized government workers, who'll issue Certificates Of Cleanliness that must be exchanged for your groceries. Sure that'll cost a lot, but it'll save lives and you didn't think the government wasn't going to protect you, right?

Posted at 13:47 by Chris Wysocki   [/democrats]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: Democrats nanny-state freedom bag-tax   |   Tweet

It's OK to slaughter thousands of bald eagles if you're promoting "green energy"

The bald eagle. A majestic symbol of America. Proud. Unafraid.

And, protected by the Endangered Species Act.

Unless you're the owner of an Obama-approved Wind Farm.

Then, let the killing begin!

Bald Eagle sushi! It's "conservation."

"The permitting system gives us access to eagles and eagle mortalities that we wouldn't otherwise have," an unnamed source told ABC News. "It's a great mechanism for us to work proactively to prevent eagle deaths."

Eagle chop suey prevents eagle deaths!

Also work makes you free.

If even one bald eagle got coated in oil, you can bet your bottom dollar Obama's ecowarriors would be screaming from the ramparts, and fighting tooth and nail to shut that oil company down.

But "green energy" boondoggles trump ecology every time in Obamaville.

He'll throw hundreds of millions of dollars at the failure that was Solyndra, but pledge to bankrupt tried and true coal producers.

Sneeze in the direction of a piping plover, and New Jersey will put your in prison. But slaughter thousands of bald eagles and Obama will praise your dedication to combating "climate change."

Nevermind that more than 14,000 abandoned wind turbines dot the landscape, monuments to the stupidity of "green energy."

The good news is they aren't killing any more bald eagles.

The bad news is we wasted billions of tax dollars creating these eyesores.

You know what never killed a single eagle? Or for that matter, any piping plovers?

Fracking.

And nuclear energy.

So ask yourself this. Why do the econuts oppose both?

I'll help you out.

It's because at the end of the day they aren't pro-environment.

They're anti-people.

Posted at 21:08 by Chris Wysocki   [/agw]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: Obama wind-farm bald-eagle endangered-species green-energy   |   Tweet

Obama spokesman comes clean on how he manipulates a willing media to shape the narrative

Much hay is being made today about how sanctimonious Obama administration "foreign policy advisor without any actual foreign policy experience" Ben Rhodes snookered Americans into supporting the disastrous Iran nuclear deal.

And this Rhodes fellow surely is a piece of work. He created a panoply of astroturf "experts" and fake Twitter feeds to disseminate a plethora of fabrications supporting his boss's policy. How did he get away with it?

Because the people he was feeding it to are a bunch of naive know-nothings.

"All these newspapers used to have foreign bureaus," Rhodes said. "Now they don't. They call us to explain to them what's happening in Moscow and Cairo. Most of the outlets are reporting on world events from Washington. The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That's a sea change. They literally know nothing."

We literally have a media that doesn't know what it doesn't know.

And worse, an American public that by and large doesn't care.

These know-nothings are given the power to shape our policy discussions and sway public opinion because they're educated, having graduated from Ivy League bastions of liberal indoctrination.

Harvard and its academic siblings, American culture's spoiled institutional trust fund children, fully intend to safeguard their position as the conformity factories manufacturing America's leadership class. They are an assembly line of indoctrination that bolts together elitists out of socialism, amorality and entitlement, and then sets them loose on American society reeking of that new snob smell.

When I grew up in the 1970s the mantra was "question authority."

Today's kids are force-fed appeals to authority. From "climate change" to "tolerance" they are being told what to think and no one is teaching them how to think. Is it any wonder then that our politics are so polarized?

As traditionally conceived, liberal education would temper the all-too-common tendency to demonize those fellow citizens with whom we disagree. In no small measure, the value of a liberal education — to the individual and to the public — stems from the ability it cultivates to explore moral and political questions from a variety of viewpoints. This virtue entails putting oneself in another's shoes. It promotes toleration, civility, and mutual respect. In "On Liberty," John Stuart Mill called this the virtue of "many-sidedness."

Ben Rhodes and his ilk are the antithesis of John Stuart Mill.

However, as currently practiced at our leading colleges and universities — through which a disproportionate percentage of our elites pass — liberal education cultivates single-sidedness and reinforces the polarization of our politics. The campus assault on free speech, the abandonment of the fundamental requirements of due process in university disciplinary procedures regarding accusations of sexual misconduct, and the hollowing and politicizing of the curriculum have become distressingly entrenched features of academic life. Their toxic effects are harming the country.

Those who have failed to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them.

We now live in an age where all ideas are considered equally valid. Why? Because, feelings. "I feel" has replaced "I think."

I feel, therefore I am, uh, valid, or something, said Voltaire, in a Common Core history lesson detailing the French revolution's disparate impact on transgender people of color.

It's impossible to have a rational discussion if the other person equates disagreement with hurting their feelings.

So my opposition to Obama's policies is automatically racism. Investigating potential terrorists is de facto evidence of Islamophobia. My support for traditional marriage and living my Catholic faith must be due to my hatred of homosexuals. End of discussion. There can be no other reason, because, feelings.

Feelings begat Bernie Sanders. And coed bathrooms. The right to not be offended trumps the Constitution now. Give me liberty a Safe Space, or give me, well, certainly not death. Extra cookies perhaps.

Meanwhile the perpetually aggrieved willingly submit to authority, because authority pays lip service to all those things that make them feel good about themselves. Hard truths make people uncomfortable, and look!, it's Kim Kardashian!

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. Bruce Jenner is a woman.

This image was recently posted to Facebook, seen as one of those "a friend of a friend liked this" things that oftentimes pop up, tagged "I'm proud of my political ignorance."

I didn't know whether to laugh, or cry.

This person votes.

And she is, of course, hardly unique.

She is also Ben Rhodes', and his media sycophants', target audience.

I'm sure all her friends consider her to be a Model Citizen too.

The problem with our nation isn't that either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton will succeed Barack Obama as our next president.

The problem with our nation is an education system that produced a citizenry willing to elect Barack Obama and then accept Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton as our next president.

They don't know what they don't know. Which is exactly how the pupppet masters like it.

Posted at 11:47 by Chris Wysocki   [/media]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: media Obama know-nothings education Ben-Rhodes   |   Tweet

Obama threatens North Carolina for saying men can't pee with women

The Obama Administration says they will punish North Carolina schoolchildren unless the state lets men use the same bathroom as women.

Poppycock.

Men, including genetically identifiable men, can use the men's room.

Women, including genetically identifiable women, can use the ladies room.

That's science. And reality.

But reality has no bearing on how the Obama Administration operates. They'll withhold federal education dollars unless North Carolina let's men pee with women.

"To use our children and their educational futures as pawns to advance an agenda that will ultimately open those same children up to exploitation at the hands of sexual predators is by far, the sickest example of the depths the Obama Administration will stoop to 'fundamentally transform our nation.'"

A few molested kids is a small price to pay for transgender "equality," depths of depravity be damned.

The important thing here is that sexual deviants and mentally ill children "feel good" about themselves.

Nevermind that those same children cannot ingest an aspirin, get a tattoo, pierce their belly button, or lay in a tanning bed. But by golly they can pretend they're "transgender!"

This is what the Obama administration is defending.

Children, deciding to reject their bodies, because "civil rights."

You know what? I was a fat, dorky kid in high school. Perhaps I should have "identified" as a linebacker. Where's my varsity letter?

North Carolina is well within their rights to define the extent of their laws.

No law in North Carolina will prevent a woman from doing anything all other women do. And no law in North Carolina will prevent a man from doing what all other men in North Carolina do.

But I suppose Obama's transgender deviants have never met the Tenth Amendment.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

In North Carolina, the "people" have spoken.

But Obama hates federalism.

He demands obeisance, because that's how he fundamentally transforms America.

So go ahead Obama. Punish the children of North Carolina. Show their parents just how petty and vindictive you really are. Withhold your federal education dollars. Close the national parks and shut down highway construction too. Make it clear that the citizens must acquiesce to deviancy just to recoup their own tax dollars.

Just remember that the Boston Tea Party arose for a comparatively lesser tyranny. And be advised accordingly.

Posted at 22:22 by Chris Wysocki   [/news]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: North-Carolina Obama LGBT transgender bathroom   |   Tweet

Thanks Trumpalumpas, you just guaranteed Hitlery will be the next president

America is doomed.

The Founding Fathers' vision has been extinquished. The tree of liberty is dead.

Democrat Donald Trump is now the presumptive Republican nominee.

My wife is at this moment watching CNN, where Anderson Cooper is cumming in his pants at the prospect of Hillary Clinton being elected president.

He's not alone.

The forces of darkness are rejoicing.

Trump was, is, and always will be a stalking horse for Hitlery.

That's why Bill Clinton convinced him to seek the GOP nomination.

That's the plan the three of them concocted in Chappaqua, to divide and conquer the Real Republicans.

Remember how Trump praised Hitlery, time and time again? That's because he believes in her.

And you morons fell for it.

Mark my words, Donald Trump cannot, and will not win in November. His negatives are sky-high. His appeal is skin-deep.

Not that he'd be any better if he did win. In many ways he's more liberal than she is. Can you imagine his pro-abortion, sharia-loving sister on the Supreme Court? You'll beg the senate to confirm Merrick Garland.

Here's my advice America, buy another gun.

Hell, buy ten more guns. And a truckload of ammo too.

Lay in canned goods, bottled water, and batteries. Fill your jerrycans.

Hunker down, because things are going to get really ugly.

Hillary Clinton's tyranny will make you yearn for Barack Obama. The IRS, the EPA, the DOJ, OSHA, ATF, TSA, probably even the postal inspectors, they're all coming for us. Re-education camps won't be the half of it.

I wonder if I'll be loaded into a boxcar before the Islamists face off against the homofascists. Seventh century shithole, here we come.

Because freedom was just another word for everything we had to lose.

Posted at 21:53 by Chris Wysocki   [/election]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: Donald-Trump Hillary-Clinton Ted-Cruz   |   Tweet

Planned Parenthood CEO: My proudest moment is forcing the Little Sisters of the Poor to pay for abortions

Cecile Richards is undoubtedly the most vile woman on the planet. In her role as CEO of Planned Parenthood she has presided over the murder of 55 million children. And when asked to cite her "proudest moment," she didn't hesitate to emphasize her organization's vendetta against Catholic nuns.

Her "movement," it should be noted, is hell-bent on imposing its will on Catholic nuns.

Abortion is the highest, most sacred sacrament of feminism. No woman is really complete until she's had one. Just ask Gloria Steinem, the Patron Saint of feminist theory.

Planned Parenthood has, of course, endorsed Hillary Clinton for president. Which means that her administration will redouble Obama's efforts to extinguish Christian opposition to abortion.

Prison for pro-life views is then not outside the realm of possibility. Because Hillary is 100% in favor of infanticide. Criminialization of opposition viewpoints is the hallmark of her supporters' fascist worldview.

And yet there are millions of Americans who are ready to annoint Hillary as our next presient. One can only assume they are to a woman OK with seeing Kermit Gosnell as the next Surgeon General, as they gleefully send Catholic nuns to martyrdom.

Posted at 22:30 by Chris Wysocki   [/feminists]   Comments | Perm Link |
Technorati Tags: abortion feminism Planned-Parenthood   |   Tweet